Posted by: bj | February 13, 2018

It’s Not Your Time Yet

It’s Not Your Time Yet

Posted by: bj | February 9, 2018

 Federer Serve –  Whoa there –

Federer Serve –  Whoa there –

At least well over 100 MPH


Posted by: bj | February 8, 2018

The Pyramids – Interesting Story –




The Pyramids – Interesting Story –



Posted by: bj | February 2, 2018





February 2, 2018

The Honorable Devin Nunes

Chairman, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence

United States Capitol

Washington, DC 20515

Dear Mr. Chairman:

On January 29, 2018, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (hereinafter “the Committee”) voted to disclose publicly a memorandum containing classified information provided to the Committee in connection with its oversight activities (the “Memorandum,” which is attached to this letter). As provided by clause 11(g) of Rule X of the House of Representatives, the Committee has forwarded this Memorandum to the President based on its determination that the release of the Memorandum would serve the public interest.

The Constitution vests the President with the authority to protect national security secrets from disclosure. As the Supreme Court has recognized, it is the President’s responsibility to classify, declassify, and control access to information bearing on our intelligence sources and methods and national defense. See, e.g., Dep’t of Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518, 527 (1988). In order to facilitate appropriate congressional oversight, the Executive Branch may entrust classified information to the appropriate committees of Congress, as it has done in connection with the Committee’s oversight activities here. The Executive Branch does so on the assumption that the Committee will responsibly protect such classified information, consistent with the laws of the United States.

The Committee has now determined that the release of the Memorandum would be appropriate. The Executive Branch, across Administrations of both parties, has worked to accommodate congressional requests to declassify specific materials in the public interest. However, public release of classified information by unilateral action of the Legislative Branch is extremely rare and raises significant separation of powers concerns. Accordingly, the Committee’s request to release the Memorandum is interpreted as a request for declassification pursuant to the President’s authority.

The President understands that the protection of our national security represents his highest obligation. Accordingly, he has directed lawyers and national security staff to assess the declassification request, consistent with established standards governing the handling of classified information, including those under Section 3.1(d) of Executive Order 13526. Those standards permit declassification when the public interest in disclosure outweighs any need to protect the information. The White House review process also included input from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Justice. Consistent with this review and these standards, the President has determined that declassification of the Memorandum is Appropriate.

Based on this assessment and in light of the significant public interest in the memorandum, the President has authorized the declassification of the Memorandum. To be clear, the Memorandum reflects the judgments of its congressional authors. The President understands that oversight concerning matters related to the Memorandum may be continuing. Though the circumstances leading to the declassification through this process are extraordinary, the Executive Branch stands ready to work with Congress to accommodate oversight requests consistent with applicable standards and processes, including the need to protect intelligence sources and methods.


Declassified by order of the President — February 2, 2018

January 18, 2018

To: HPSCI Majority Members

From: HPSCI Majority Staff

Subject: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Abuses at the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation


This memorandum provides Members an update on significant facts relating to the Committee’s ongoing investigation into the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and their use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) during the 2016 presidential election cycle. Our findings, which are detailed below, 1) raise concerns with the legitimacy and legality of certain DOJ and FBI interactions with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), and 2) represent a troubling breakdown of legal processes established to protect the American people from abuses related to the FISA process.

Investigation Update

On October 21, 2016, DOJ and FBI sought and received a FISA probable cause order (not under Title VII) authorizing electronic surveillance on Carter Page from the FISC. Page is a U.S. citizen who served as a volunteer advisor to the Trump presidential campaign. Consistent with requirements under FISA, the application had to be first certified by the Director or Deputy Director of the FBI. It then required the approval of the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General (DAG), or the Senate-confirmed Assistant Attorney General for the National Security Division.

The FBI and DOJ obtained one initial FISA warrant targeting Carter Page and three FISA renewals from the FISC. As required by statute (50 U.S.C. §1805(d)(1)), a FISA order on an American citizen must be renewed by the FISC every 90 days and each renewal requires a separate finding of probable cause. Then-Director James Comey signed three FISA applications in question on behalf of the FBI, and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe signed one. Then-DAG Sally Yates, then-Acting DAG Dana Boente, and DAG Rod Rosenstein each signed one or more FISA applications on behalf of DOJ.

Due to the sensitive nature of foreign intelligence activity, FISA submissions (including renewals) before the FISC are classified. As such, the public’s confidence in the integrity of the FISA process depends on the court’s ability to hold the government to the highest standard particularly as it relates to surveillance of American citizens. However, the FISC’s rigor in protecting the rights of Americans, which is reinforced by 90-day renewals of surveillance orders, is necessarily dependent on the government’s production to the court of all material and relevant facts. This should include information potentially favorable to the target of the FISA application that is known by the government. In the case of Carter Page, the government had at least four independent opportunities before the FISC to accurately provide an accounting of the relevant facts. However, our findings indicate that, as described below, material and relevant information was omitted.

1) The “dossier” compiled by Christopher Steele (Steele dossier) on behalf of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Hillary Clinton campaign formed an essential part of the Carter Page FISA application. Steele was a longtime FBI source who was paid over $160,000 by the DNC and Clinton campaign, via the law firm Perkins Coie and research firm Fusion GPS, to obtain derogatory information on Donald Trump’s ties to Russia.

a) Neither the initial application in October 2016, nor any of the renewals, disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign in funding Steele’s efforts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior DOJ and FBI officials.

b) The initial FISA application notes Steele was working for a named U.S. person, but does not name Fusion GPS and principal Glenn Simpson, who was paid by a U.S. law firm (Perkins Coie) representing the DNC (even though it was known by DOJ at the time that political actors were involved with the Steele dossier). The application does not mention Steele was ultimately working on behalf of—and paid by—the DNC and Clinton campaign, or that the FBI had separately authorized payment to Steele for the same information.

2) The Carter Page FISA application also cited extensively a September 23, 2016, Yahoo News article by Michael Isikoff, which focuses on Page’s July 2016 trip to Moscow. This article does not corroborate the Steele dossier because it is derived from information leaked by Steele himself to Yahoo News. The Page FISA application incorrectly assesses that Steele did not directly provide information to Yahoo News. Steele has admitted in British court filings that he met with Yahoo News—and several other outlets—in September 2016 at the direction of Fusion GPS. Perkins Coie was aware of Steele’s initial media contacts because they hosted at least one meeting in Washington D.C. in 2016 with Steele and Fusion GPS where this matter was discussed.

a) Steele was suspended and then terminated as an FBI source for what the FBI defines as the most serious of violations—an unauthorized disclosure to the media of his relationship with the FBI in an October 30, 2016, Mother Jones article by David Corn. Steele should have been terminated for his previous undisclosed contacts with Yahoo and other outlets in September—before the Page application was submitted to the FISC in October—but Steele improperly concealed from and lied to the FBI about those contacts.

b) Steele’s numerous encounters with the media violated the cardinal rule of source handling—maintaining confidentiality—and demonstrated that Steele had become a less than reliable source for the FBI.

3) Before and after Steele was terminated as a source, he maintained contact with DOJ via then-Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr, a senior DOJ official who worked closely with Deputy Attorneys General Yates and later Rosenstein. Shortly after the election, the FBI began interviewing Ohr, documenting his communications with Steele. For example, in September 2016, Steele admitted to Ohr his feelings against then-candidate Trump when Steele said he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.” This clear evidence of Steele’s bias was recorded by Ohr at the time and subsequently in official FBI files—but not reflected in any of the Page FISA applications.

a) During this same time period, Ohr’s wife was employed by Fusion GPS to assist in the cultivation of opposition research on Trump. Ohr later provided the FBI with all of his wife’s opposition research, paid for by the DNC and Clinton campaign via Fusion GPS. The Ohrs’ relationship with Steele and Fusion GPS was inexplicably concealed from the FISC.

4) According to the head of the FBI’s counterintelligence division, Assistant Director Bill Priestap, corroboration of the Steele dossier was in its “infancy” at the time of the initial Page FISA application. After Steele was terminated, a source validation report conducted by an independent unit within FBI assessed Steele’s reporting as only minimally corroborated. Yet, in early January 2017, Director Comey briefed President-elect Trump on a summary of the Steele dossier, even though it was—according to his June 2017 testimony—“salacious and unverified.” While the FISA application relied on Steele’s past record of credible reporting on other unrelated matters, it ignored or concealed his anti-Trump financial and ideological motivations. Furthermore, Deputy Director McCabe testified before the Committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISC without the Steele dossier information.

5) The Page FISA application also mentions information regarding fellow Trump campaign advisor George Papadopoulos, but there is no evidence of any cooperation or conspiracy between Page and Papadopoulos. The Papadopoulos information triggered the opening of an FBI counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016 by FBI agent Pete Strzok. Strzok was reassigned by the Special Counsel’s Office to FBI Human Resources for improper text messages with his mistress, FBI Attorney Lisa Page (no known relation to Carter Page), where they both demonstrated a clear bias against Trump and in favor of Clinton, whom Strzok had also investigated. The Strzok/Lisa Page texts also reflect extensive discussions about the investigation, orchestrating leaks to the media, and include a meeting with Deputy Director McCabe to discuss an “insurance” policy against President Trump’s election.

Posted by: bj | January 31, 2018

Lunch on Top of Rockefeller Center


Lunch on Top of Rockefeller Center  


Posted by: bj | January 25, 2018



Go DONALD! Trump Just Ended Obama’s Vacation Scam
And Sent Him A Bill You Have To See To Believe

He was going to stick us for 2.1 billion or so.

Before Obama left office,
he arranged with the State Department for a series of “official

visits” to foreign countries, spanning the next 20 years.

Using discretionary funds from the Office of Presidential Visits and

Obama was able to weasel what would have been another $2.1                                   billion in free vacations
for him and up to 24 members of his family plus staff and a dog sitter until the year 2036.

He would have, that is, had he not lost his office to Donald Trump.

Trump, who is always looking for ways to save money,
was having the office used for vacations repainted
when he was presented with a ledger that contained all of the Obama travel plans and expenses.

The ledger was found by one of the 31 workers Trump hired from outside the typical White House staff
to make alterations requiring specialized craftsmen

Trump immediately canceled the plans
and recalled all Secret Service agents scheduled to protect the Obamas
anywhere outside of the United States

The Obamas, who are still waiting in Kenya for their documents,
so they can re-enter the country,
are also facing another new challenge at the hands of Trump.

They’re going to have to repay the government for all of those vacations that weren’t official state business.

The bill, after some small allowances, for days that were possibly work related, is for $214 million.

Of the 692 days the Obamas spent on vacation, almost none included any work at all.
They ate, slept and golfed
and Michelle was given shopping allowances from the Office of Discretionary Gifting Funds,
which is supposed to be used to buy presents for visiting dignitaries.

It’s just one scandal after another with these people.

Share this.

Posted by: bj | January 25, 2018

Take a Knee…….my Ass

Posted by: bj | January 19, 2018

The Invisible Man

The Invisible Man

This was invented by a fellow in China.  It could revolutionize warfare.


Posted by: bj | January 18, 2018

Biggest Corruption Scandal in US History

Biggest Corruption Scandal in US History, is about to unfold: Today, the Congress finally received long awaited and classified Dossier information from the Justice Department.  Will the public get to see it?

  • Corruption at the Top of the Obama Administration FBI.
  • Corruption at the top of the Obama Administration  Justice Department.
  • Corruption of Hillary Clinton when she and associates destroyed over 33,000 emails and transmitted top secret documents over un-protected and personal computers, laptops and smart phones.
  • Corruption at the Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee for hiring Fusion GPS, who engages Christopher Steele, a British spy, who engages Russian spy to create a false and salacious dossier to discredit candidate Trump and destroy President Trump,  (cost to Hillary and the DNC =  $12 million +)
  • Corruption at the Clinton Foundation for allowing Russia to acquire 20% of Uranium deposits in the United  States for contributions to the Clinton Foundation of over $145 million.
  • Corruption when the FBI (Comey, who Trump fired)  finds Hillary Clinton (and her associates) not guilty of destroying 33,000 emails, computers, cell phones and documents months before they are all formally investigated.
  • The US Justice Department (Jeff Sessions) has just re-opened the Uranium One and Hillary 33,000 emails scandals.
  • More Corruption at the FBI when the FBI receives the above dossier and uses it to obtain FISA warrants from Federal judges to conduct surveillance on the Trump campaign and Trump associates.
  • Corruption at the FBI and Justice Department when they both refuse to cooperate with the US Congress (who oversees them) for months and even refuses to answer the question:  “Did you use the dossier to obtain the FISA warrants to obtain the surveillance?”
  • By not answering this question, they obviously admitted they used the dossier to obtain the FISA “spying” warrants
  • The Comey leaking of information, the dossier and Trump firing the head of the FBI, Comey,  was what caused, Deputy Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein, to appoint a Special Prosecutor, Former head of the FBI, Robert Muller, to find Trump and Russian collusion in the 2016 election.
  • Potential Corruption of Robert Muller, who employed 15 anti Trump and pro  Hillary people to find Trump collusion with Russia.
  • Muller and Congressional committees have spent 8 months trying to find Trump guilty of something and have come up with nothing.
  • The dossier which is now (as of today)  proven to be a sham and was primarily used to appoint Muller, the special prosecutor to get Trump, should now lead to the Muller Special Prosecutor team being shut down.
  • Corruption in 90% of the Media, most notably, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC who constantly disseminate false news and thus far refuse to cover any of this blockbuster news.  You will only see this on FOX News.
  • This is all the tip of the Iceberg.

No wonder liberals and democrats are going off the deep end calling Trump, mentally incompetent, a racist,  in terrible health, etc., etc.  They are freaking out about the US public learning  about all the above information.  

They are toast when the mainstream media reports the real news.  

Below is a Video of Mark Levin describing some of the above:

Posted by: bj | January 16, 2018

Governor Lamb: I Have a Plan to Destroy America

Governor Lamb: I Have a Plan to Destroy America –

Older Posts »