Biden’s DOJ To Interfere With Forensic Audit Of Maricopa County Ballots

(Republican Insider) – It seems the Democrats are truly terrified of the results from the Maricopa County forensic audit being published in the public eye because they are pulling out all of the stops to ensure that this project is not completed and their dirty deeds remain hidden in the dark.

According to Gateway Pundit, the very same organization that helped to cook up the whole Russian collusion nonsense and allowed voter fraud to run rampant in the 2020 presidential race is now going to be sticking their nose into the audit in Maricopa County.

Journalist Garrett Archer with ABC15 in Phoenix, Arizona has reported that the Biden Department of Justice is set to “get involved in some capacity” with the forensic audit, which is still happening right now.

It’s really important to note, once again, that the Department of Justice did absolutely nothing as Democrats prevented Republicans from being able to be in the same room where ballot counting was happening. They also did nothing to stop vans from dropping off loads of ballots in the cover of darkness.

And now they want to step into this audit and shut it down. Innocent people don’t typically act this way. Here’s a copy of the letter from the DOJ addressed to Secretary of State Fann.

However, the DOJ isn’t the only leftist agency or group seeking to get in on the audit and shut it down or disrupt it in some capacity. One such group is Project Democracy, who sent a letter to those carrying out the audit, threatening them with legal action.

The letter was signed by Perkins Coie, which is the exact same firm that represented Hillary Clinton and was heavily involved in the Russia probe.

And, as always, George Soros has a huge role to play in this interference. Soros has deep connections with a group known as the Brennan Center, which is a far-left activist group and legal organization, having received over $1 million in funding from various progressive billionaires.

Then there’s the Leadership Conference, which is a coalition that is composed of over 200 entities with the common mission of “equality.”

“The Leadership Conference’s founders came together in 1950 out of the belief that the fight for civil rights could not be won by one group alone, but needed to be waged in coalition,” the report says.

“Our members — which have grown from 30 civil and human rights organizations at our founding to more than 200 today — differ in size, scope, and structure. But what transcends our differences and unites The Leadership Conference coalition is our enduring common purpose: full equality for all,” the GP report says.

As stated at the beginning of the piece, the radical left is desperately trying to prevent the masses from getting the results from the Maricopa County recount. You can tell they don’t want this information out to the public. If regular folks find out the truth about the election. The truth must be known by all

Posted by: bj | May 4, 2021

Avoiding the Future Plague – 1954 –

Predictions from 70 years ago.

Far Left Media Lying and Propaganda Requires America to have a new Dictionary to understand the new political lingo.  Most of these new words or phrases are the product of ideas promulgated by Socialism, Marxism and Communist oriented media in American society.  

Critical Race Theory:  CRT is loosely unified by two common themes:

  • First, that white supremacy and subornation of people of color exists and maintains power through the law. 
  • Second, Racial Freedom still does not exist and the law must be changed or “transformed” so “racial freedom” is finally achieved

Corporate Wokeism:   One Hundred and Twenty of the largest corporations in America support our most dangerous enemy, Communist China, because they are doing billions of $ in business with them; while at the same time giving hundreds of millions of $ to Black Lives Matter, an avowed Marxist, Communist organization who advocates the elimination of Capitalism, (which made it possible for those very corporations to flourish and prosper.  Incredible: Where are the Republicans in opposition?

Wokeism and Wokeism Fascism:

Lying on purpose for political advantage.


  • The enemy within:  Corporations Become Anti – America:  Push Wokeism and wade into politics and act as Activists for the Democrat Party:  United Airlines, Delta Airlines, Microsoft, JP Morgan, Apple, Major League Baseball, the NBA, the NFL,   etc. are lying when they claim Georgia Election Law limits access to the ballot box; when they know exactly the opposite is true.  
  • How do you know if you’re living in a free society? Here’s a quick test: Are you allowed to say obviously true things in public? Or are you forced to lie? As George Orwell put it in “1984”: “Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.”  But what if that freedom isn’t granted? What if you’re required to repeat things that you know aren’t true? What if everyone who hears you knows perfectly well that you’re lying, but they can’t say so out loud? What if everyone is required to nod along in mock sincerity as if it’s all completely real?
  • CNN, MSNBC and others lie “on purpose” a daily basis in an attempt to destroy conservative people, institutions and media.  Now that they got rid of Trump by 4 years of lying, their new Target for lies is “global warming”. As CNN puts it: “FEAR SELLS”. They are on video saying it.
  • That’s what a pep rally in a police state looks like: Thanks to the dear leader for a bountiful potato harvest!” they chant, even as they starve to death.
  • A few years ago, back when he was best known for being mayor of South Bend, Ind., Mr. Buttigieg made the point that “all lives matter.” He said it because it’s true. All lives do matter, no matter what they look like. Every life has value — period. That’s the message of Christianity and the civilization that it spawned in the West. But in the modern Democratic Party, it can no longer be acknowledged. So Mr. Buttigieg recently apologized for his wrong thinking.
  • A few years ago, Ms. Kirsten Gillibrand once expressed sympathy for the idea of a closed border. Looking back, she is deeply ashamed. She can hardly believe she ever thought something so immoral.  There’s nothing liberal about this, obviously. It’s purely authoritarian: “woke” fascism. Power over ideas. In place of thinking, obedience. In return for dissent, punishment. Lying as official policy — and not just conventional lying, the ordinary truth-shading of everyday life, but terrifying full-inversion lies. The exact opposite of the truth. The kind of lies that regimes that seek total control must tell in order to maintain their power.
  • The latest of these lies is that low-grade mafia figure Al Sharpton is, in fact, a legitimate civil rights leader. The Democratic candidates claim to believe that now. They recently trooped over to his tax-exempt organization to pretend he’s the new MLK.  Where were these people in the mid-1990s when Rev. Sharpton was denouncing a Jewish landlord in Harlem as a “white interloper” shortly before his store was firebombed. None of them was woke yet. They are now; and eight people were killed. 

They went to Rev. Sharpton to clamor for an idea that not even 20% of the population supports: race-based reparations. Rev. Sharpton asked each candidate if he or she would pledge to support Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee’s bill to form a commission to study how to do reparations. Every single candidate at the event expressed complete support.  

The question isn’t whether we get reparations. The question is whether you want to live in a country where such people have political power, where humor and dissent are criminal acts, where lying is the currency of public life, where authorities whose names you don’t know can destroy you for thinking “the wrong things”. You’ve seen that world before. It’s called Twitter, Facebook, etc.

Equality:  Equality generally refers to equal opportunity and the same levels of support for all segments of society.  Zero discrimination under the law.

  • Example:  Government subsidies on gasoline or food. The subsidy is available to all people, rich and poor alike.

Equity:  Equity goes a step further and refers offering varying levels of support depending upon need to achieve equal outcomes.  A Marxist Philosophy of Equal redistribution.

  • Example:  Affirmative action policies (a.k.a “reservation” and “quotas” for certain marginalized sections of society); decisions by companies to consciously look for a female director for their board that is composed of all men.
  • United Airlines newly announced policy to hire a minimum of 50% of new pilots “people of color” and “female”.  Shouldn’t the policy be to hire the “best” regardless of color or sexual orientation? 
  • Male athletes who identify as a female can participate in female sporting events.

Anti White Diversity Training:  American companies promising to hire more Black employees in leadership roles and teach their workforce about racism.  (This sounds like discrimination against “white” and racism to me)  Coke announced a new policy regarding this last week.

Gender Nutrality: or the gender neutrality movement, is the idea that policies, language, and other social institutions (social structuresgender roles, or gender identity) should avoid distinguishing roles according to people’s sex or gender. This is in order to avoid discrimination arising from the impression that there are social roles for which one gender is more suited than another. In order to increase gender neutrality in recent years, there has been a societal emphasis on utilizing  inclusive language and advocating for “equality”.

Systemic Racism:  The “Left” believes systemic racism describes the oppression by white people of “non white people”, because of their race.  The “Right” believes that systemic racism does not exist and the “Left” goal is to marginalize “people of color” as they call them so that they, the “people of color” will be beholden to the left when they redistribute wealth to them.   

Cancel Culture:  A modern form of ostracism in which someone is thrust out of social or professional circles – whether it be online, on social media, or in person. Those who are subject to this ostracism are said to have been “cancelled”.  The expression “cancel culture” implies censorship and anti free speech.   An example is Twitter and AOL banning posts with politically conservative viewpoints, such as those of President Trump and others.

EXPLOSIVE: Investigators for Attorney DePerno Reportedly Discover Modem Chips Embedded in Michigan Voting System Computer Motherboards

By Jim Hoft, April 10, 2021:

Friday’s release by Attorney Matthew DePerno on his ongoing election fraud investigation was explosive.

For months the companies behind the computer voting systems claimed their computers did not have internet access.

In his report that was filed in Michigan court, DePerno revealed that the ES&S DS200 voting machines contain a Telit LE910-SV1 Modem Chip installed on its motherboard.

Friday’s release by Attorney Matthew DePerno on his ongoing election fraud investigation was explosive.

For months the companies behind the computer voting systems claimed their computers did not have internet access.

In his report that was filed in Michigan court, DePerno revealed that the ES&S DS200 voting machines contain a Telit LE910-SV1 Modem Chip installed on its motherboard.

SEE Exhibit 6 in Antrim County Lawsuit

According to Patrick Colbeck at Let’s Fix Stuff, the chip utilized a commercial Verizon SIM card with an Access Point Name (APN) configuration specific to the ES&S DS200 provisioning.

ESS DS200 Motherboard with Telit LE910-SV1 Modem Chip

According to former Senator Patrick Colbeck
What does the Telit LE910-SV1 Modem Chip do?

  • Enable communication between voting system equipment and election servers
  • Designed to operate on a virtual private network
  • Testing has revealed that the same SIM card could be used in a separate wireless hotspot device. This device could then join the same APN as the ES&S voting machines.

The US has a tremendous history – too bad it is not taught to the new generation.  Their loss is inestimable. 

These Ladies proved they could make air travel safe. They put their lives on the line to prove it. A truly amazing story of dedication and courage, At the start of aviation.  You benefit today.       

In 1932, stunt pilot Bettie Lund watched her husband and flying partner, Freddie, crash to his death. Barely over the initial shock, she took a telephone call from the manager of the Charlotte, N.C., airport, who told her about Freddie’s contract to appear in an air show there. “I’ll fly in his place,” Lund said.

That began Lund’s solo career of aerobatics–barrel rolls, slow rolls and inverted flying–along with the air races she regularly entered. She felt, Lund told a reporter, that she was a “crusader to establish the safety of the air.”

Lund, air racer Phoebe Omlie, trailblazer Amelia Earhart, record breaker Jacqueline Cochran and dozens of other remarkable women in the 1930s became the symbols of a new era in aviation. Their mission: convince people that flying was a safe means of transportation and that women made good pilots.

Major Selling Job

The high-powered, high-flying women of early aviation had a major selling job to do. To the public of post-World War I America, flying was for the “foolhardy,” or for the very wealthy who could afford to buy airplanes in the days when it was a fashionable stunt to land at a garden party or a race course.

“The female pilots of the 1930s had a humanizing influence on aviation,” said Claudia M. Oakes, associate curator at the Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum in Washington. Oakes is author of a new book, “United States Women in Aviation, 1930-1939,” celebrating the careers of these pilots who made headlines in their day but are mostly forgotten now.

“The women made flying seem less dangerous, more commonplace,” Oakes said. “People of the day started to think, ‘If a woman can fly, anyone can,’ and this helped the general aviation industry to grow.”

The decade’s famous female pilots were not only concerned with safety and comfort. Blanche Noyes, Louise Thaden, Omlie, Cochran and many others competed against men in air races–and won. Laura Ingalls performed 714 barrel rolls in a row on May 8, 1930, destroying the men’s record of 417. Omlie and Pancho Barnes were noted movie stunt pilots of the ‘30s.

Unprecedented Journeys

The airplane made it possible for women to travel alone on unprecedented journeys. Earhart, history’s best-known female pilot, flew many “firsts”–the first woman to fly as a passenger across the Atlantic (1928), the first person to fly across the Atlantic twice (1932) In 1932, piloting a Lockheed Vega 5B, Earhart made a nonstop solo transatlantic flight, becoming the first woman to achieve such a feat., the first to solo from Hawaii to the U.S. mainland (1935). Amy Johnson, Beryl Markham, Lady Mary Heath and others pioneered hazardous, long-distance air routes.

Ruth Nichols set a non-stop distance record, from Oakland, Calif., to Louisville, Ky., in 1931, just a few months after severely injuring her back in an airplane crash. Nichols was the only woman simultaneously to hold the women’s records for speed, distance and altitude in heavy land planes. She was one of the first women to fly dirigibles, gliders, seaplanes, amphibians and four-engine aircraft.

Nichols knew that women’s air races and distance flights attracted publicity. “News,” she wrote in a 1932 magazine article, “is a salable asset and has a concrete value in dollars and cents,” money that could help improve aircraft design and safety. They were always concerned for others. 

Fay Gillis Wells, another well-known pilot of the 1930s, said of Nichols: “She just never gave up. She wanted to be the first woman to fly across the Atlantic, but she crashed in Newfoundland and Amelia (Earhart) beat her to it.”

Flew in Soviet Plane

Wells, now in her 70s, had an unusual opportunity in 1930, when her father, a mining engineer, was transferred to the Soviet Union. After moving there, she worked as a journalist and continued to fly. In 1933, she became the first American woman to fly a Soviet-made airplane. Wells was asked to accompany Wiley Post, the first person to fly solo around the world, on a trip from Los Angeles to Moscow. When she turned Post down to go on her honeymoon with journalist Linton Wells, Post chose humorist Will Rogers. Both men were killed when that flight crashed in 1935, in Alaska. . We remember the crash, it shocked everyone.  It made international headlines. . Post flew with a black eye patch over one eye. 

Earlier, in 1929, while working in the sales department of the Curtiss Wright Flying Service, Wells helped found the Ninety-Nines, an association of female pilots still active today. “We organized for the fun of it and also to have a network to pass on information about jobs,” she said. The first meeting took place in an airplane hangar above the din of an engine. Tea was served on a toolbox on wheels.

The club’s name was Earhart’s idea, Wells said. “She sat very modestly in the back row while we argued about the name. Some of us wanted names like the Lady Bugs, and others wanted to be the American Assn. of Licensed Woman Pilots. Then Amelia spoke up and said: ‘Why don’t we name ourselves after the number of our charter members?’ ”

Jacqueline Cochran, a charter member of the Ninety-Nines, became the first woman to break the sound barrier in 1953. She was also an ace in business, starting a successful cosmetics company, which her flying helped publicize. A highly competitive racer who was always eager to fly “hot” racing airplanes, Cochran won the prestigious 1938 Bendix transcontinental race.

As the American public became sold on air transportation in the 1930s, women played an increasingly important role in the selling. Dozens of new air transport lines were added, and passenger growth mushroomed.

Nichols and Earhart promoted aviation by making countless speeches and writing hundreds of magazine articles. Many airplane companies hired women to demonstrate and promote their products in the 1930s. The sales gimmick was successful for the companies, and it gave the women a chance to fly, although Helen Richey resigned her job as the first woman commercial airline pilot in 1934 because the all-male pilots’ union refused to admit her, and she was seldom allowed to fly.

The “stars” of aviation were in great demand for advertisements. “Cigarettes have nearly been my downfall,” Earhart wrote in 1928 after “wickedly endorsing” a certain cigarette, though she estimated smoking only three that year. Earhart donated her $1,500 fee to Cmdr. Richard Byrd’s South Pole expedition, but an irate reader still admonished: “I suppose you drink too!”

In 1936 and 1937, Earhart worked with female students of Purdue University, one of the few U.S. colleges to offer aviation classes to women. Purdue presented her with a new twin-engine Lockheed Electra loaded with all the latest instruments, funded by Lockheed, Bendix and other groups. The donors wanted to promote aviation, Earhart said, “and especially, perhaps, overcome women’s ‘sales resistance’ to air travel.”

It was in that Electra that Earhart and her navigator, Fred Noonan, nearly succeeding in completing the world’s longest around-the-world flight. In July, 1937, after flying 22,000 miles, the plane was lost at sea. A mystery that continues to this day.  Throughout her career as an aviation spokeswoman, Earhart insisted that the risks of long-distance flights and air races should not be compared to the safety of ordinary air transportation. “You might as well compare automobile racing with safe driving,” she wrote.

By the outbreak of World War II, Oakes noted, air travel had become commonplace. With the novelty gone from private flying, manufacturers and aircraft sales companies no longer needed women as demonstration pilots and saleswomen.

“By making aviation tamer and more acceptable,” Oakes said, “women had, ironically, closed several doors to paths they had previously followed toward fame in aviation.”

Tiny Minority

In 1930, only about 200, or 1%, of licensed American pilots were women. Though the number of female pilots today has increased to more than 44,000 (including 275 who are commercial pilots), they are still a tiny minority–6%–of all pilots.

Now, as then, however, some of the most distinguished pilots are women. For instance, Brooke Knapp, a 40-year-old pilot from Los Angeles, holds the world’s record for the fastest around-the-world flight (average speed, 512 m.p.h.)

Hazel Jones, a pilot for more than 40 years and the current president of the Ninety-Nines, believes the future of women in commercial aviation is bright. “Most airline pilots were in the military, and a great many of the Korean War-era male pilots are now retiring from commercial work. As more women get military pilot training, they’ll be stepping into those vacancies. The number of airlines also has been growing rapidly since the industry was deregulated, creating more opportunities for the woman pilot.”

Whatever the future may hold, it was the determined women aviators of the 1930s who helped pave the way. In the early 1930s, German-born Thea Rasche, a charter member of the Ninety-Nines, wryly summed up the spirit of that decade’s women aviators: “Flying is far more thrilling than love for a man and far less dangerous.”

President Biden’s Executive Orders

Executive Order: Biden signed an order on March 8, 2021 ‘Guaranteeing an Educational Environment Free From Discrimination on the Basis of Sex, Including Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity.’

Executive Order: Biden signed an order on March 8, 2021 establishing the White House Gender Policy Council.

Executive Order: Biden signed an order on March 7,2021 calling for federal agencies to promote voter registration.

Executive Order: On February 24, 2021 Biden signed an order repealing a series of executive orders previously signed by former President Trump on regulating the financial system, reducing poverty, deregulation, reviewing funds to cities harboring antifa, promoting beautiful architecture in federal buildings, and democratic accountability in agency rule-making.

Executive Order: Biden signed an order on February 24, 2021 to strengthen the resiliency of America’s supply chains.

Executive Order: Biden signed an order to revoke Trump’s order to expand apprenticeships in America. 

Executive Order:  Biden established the White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood partnerships to promote a more civil society. 

Executive Order: President Biden wrote to Congress to inform it that he had ordered various actions blocking economic activity relating to Burma in response to the recent military coup there.

Executive Order: Biden called on Congress to extend the national emergency on Libya.

Executive Order: Biden has ended the construction of the southern border wall. 

Executive Order: As per Trump’s executive order, Biden is also promoting LGBTQI+ rights worldwide. He is calling on other nations to decriminalize homosexuality. 

Executive Order: Biden will be reorganizing the National Security Council through this executive order. 

Executive Order: Biden put a memorandum on revitalizing foregin service, as known as, the “Deep State.”

Executive Order: Biden is allowing an exception for the refugee qualifications that allows people that have been displaced directly or indirectly because of climate change. 

Executive Order: Biden signed an order to reunite children separated at the border with their families.

Executive Order: Biden signed an order to ensure a safe migration for Central American immigrants to arrive safely at the border.

Executive Order: Biden reversed Trump’s enforcement of a long-standing policy against 40-million immigrants that have been living in the US unnaturalized.

Executive Order: Biden is ordering a memorandum to help direct FEMA aid to help with COVID assistance in state and local governments.

Executive Order: President Biden reversed President Trump’s decision to remove tariffs on aluminum from the UAE, which had been a reward for peacemaking with Israel.

Executive Order: Biden restored into order giving U.S. funds to overseas groups providing abortions, calling his measure an effort to protect women’s health care.

Executive Order: Biden signed into order an enrollment period for Obamacare to help those who may have lost their health insurance due to losing jobs during the pandemic. 

Executive Order: Biden signed an order requiring ‘evidence-based decisions’ in government policy. 

Executive Order: Biden signed into effect the Council of Advisors on Science and Technology to help him make evidence-based decisions. 

Executive Order: Biden vowed in this executive order to put climate change as his first priority. 

Executive Order: President Biden declared past federal housing to be racist and restored his Obama-era rule considering “disparate impact” to be racial discrimination. 

Executive Order: Biden is eliminating and reforming the use of private prisons, insinuating is promotes systematic racism even though he did not demonstrate how they promote racial discrimination.

Executive Order: President Biden signed an order to promote consultation with Native American tribes expressing his “respect for Tribal sovereignty and self-governance” and “commitment to fulfilling Federal trust and treaty responsibilities to Tribal Nations.”

Executive Order: President Biden signed an order condemning racism, xenophobia, and intolerance against Asian American and Pacific Islanders in the United States after Covid-19 has caused harassment and bullying against these groups of people. It also bans the phrase ‘China virus.’

Executive Order: Even though President Biden called Trump’s China travel ban ‘hysterical xenophobic,’ he is issuing a travel ban on South Africa, where a new variant of coronavirus was discovered. 

Executive Order: President Biden is ordering federal agencies to prioritize American companies in procurement but excluded Trump’s emphasis immigration enforcement.

Executive Order: President Biden is revoking President Trump’s ban on transgenders going into combat zones while transitioning or doing reassignment surgery, for the mere fact that the hormones and medical care couldn’t be provided to the level they would need. 

Executive Order: President Biden signed a vague order for the United States federal government to encourage union organizing and collective bargaining in order to protect the federal workforce. He also is backing a $15/hr minimum wage for federal workers. 

Executive Order: President Biden signed an executive order to alleviate the economic relief related to the Covid-19 pandemic. He will provide prioritized relief to individuals, families, and small businesses. 

Executive Order: Biden signed an order to create a COVID Testing Board which would include representatives from executive departments and agencies that are designated by the President. This group would make recommendations to Biden for shortage communities, at-risk settings, and high-risk groups.

Executive Order: Biden signed an executive order to work with other nations to combat COVID-19 to strengthen the response for global health security measures for diseases to come. 

Executive Order: Biden signed an order to promote COVID safety in the workplace. Biden will be using Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to enforce these protocols.

Executive Order: Biden signed yet another order to help schools safely re-open for in-person learning. However, many schools are still shut down with little indication when they will welcome back students.

Executive Order: President Biden signed an executive order which established a Covid-19 Healthy Equity Task Force to help promote his administration’s equity goals.

Executive Order: Biden signed an executive order which forces the Defense Production Act to assist with filling any existing gaps of medical supplies to combat the Covid-19 pandemic.

Executive Order: Biden enacted an executive order for federal agencies to continue researching Covid-19. This was already happening under the Trump administration but now the effort is being lead by the White House Covid-19 Response Director.

Executive Order::  President Biden directed the Federal Emergency Management Agency to reimburse 100% of the cost to states of using the National Guard in COVID.

Executive Order:: President Biden made an action to reserve the Obama-era DACA program. President Trump cancelled the program during his term. [Keep reading: Biden’s First Day in the White House]

Executive Order:: President Biden further extended Trump’s order that Liberians who fled to the U.S. from the civil war not be deported.

Executive Order: Biden fulfilled a campaign promise when he signed an executive order which ended construction of the southern border wall. [Keep reading: Biden Takes Aim at Trump’s Immigration Policies]

Executive Order:: Biden issued a memorandum promoting more federal regulations.

Executive Order:: Biden signed an executive order which limits how long White House officials must wait after leaving their position before working for any lobbying firm. [Keep reading: Biden’s First Day in the White House]

Executive Order:: In yet another executive order issued on Biden’s first day included an attack on women’s sports. The executive order now requires schools permit biological males to compete on women’s sports teams.

Executive Order:: President Biden signed another executive order focused on climate change. With the stroke of a pen Biden cancelled the Keystone XL pipeline contract and destroyed thousands of well-paid American jobs. Meanwhile the US unemployment rate continues to rise throughout the Covid-19 pandemic. [Keep reading: Dem Senator Urges Biden to Reverse Keystone XL Decision]

Executive Order:: Another part of Biden’s first day in the White House included signing an executive order which forces states to include the number of illegal immigrants in its census.

Executive Order:: President Biden revoked a series of Trump orders which focused on diminishing the amount of regulations. Biden revoked these Trump orders:

  • -Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs
  • – Enforcing Regulatory Reform Agenda
  • – Evaluating and Improving the Utility of Federal Advisory Committees
  • – Promoting the Rule of Law Through Improved Agency Guidance Documents
  • – Promoting the Role of Law Through Transparency and Fairness in Civil Administrative Enforcement and Adjudication
  • -Increasing Government Accountability for AdministrativeActions by Reinvigorating Administrative PAYGO)

Executive Order:: Biden also signed an Executive Order: which re-committed the U.S. to the Paris Climate Agreement. President Trump pulled the U.S. from the deal because it was unfair towards our country.

Executive order: On Jan. 20th, Biden reversed Trump’s order on enhancing public safety in the interior of the United States. This was just the first of many moves from the Biden camp to chip away at Trump’s immigration policies.

Executive Order:: During his first day on the job, Biden wasted no time by signing a record number of executive orders and actions. One of which recommitted the United States to joining the World Health Organization (WHO). In a letter to the United Nations Biden revered the Trump admin move. [Related: Fauci Selected as Biden’s Special Envoy to WHO as U.S. Rejoins]

Executive Order: After being sworn in as President on Jan. 20th, Biden signed an executive order to reorganize the White House’s COVID response team.

Executive Order: President Biden signed an executive order which now requires face masks be worn on federal property for the next 100-days. Hours later Biden and his family were seen posing for photos at the Lincoln Memorial with no masks in sight. [Related: Biden Caught Without Mask Hours after Enacting Mask Mandate]

Executive Order: On Jan. 20th President Biden signed another executive order which ended Trump’s travel bans focused on countries with pronounced threats of terrorism. 

Executive Order: His first day in office Biden signed an executive order on advancing racial equity and support for underserved communities through the federal government. The order also abolished Trump’s 1776 Commission. [Keep reading: Biden’s First day in the White House]

Memorandum: As Biden’s first act as president he issued an Executive Order which froze most of Trump’s pending regulatory changes.

Biden Encourages Illegal Aliens to flood Across Southern Border

Children Are Kept in Cages at the Border, then released 10% + with Covid

Biden Helicopters dropping billions of $ from the sky

Increasing Prices and the National Debt by Trillions of $

Biden Administration allows males to compete in female sports

Liberals call removing dead people from the voter roles…”voter suppression”

In Summary: Biden Appoints people to his Administration; not on their “Character” or “Qualifications”; but based on the color of their skin and their sexual preferences to leave no one out

Posted by: bj | April 3, 2021

Venetian Glass – Wow –

If you visit Venice you must come here.

Venetian glass is thought to have been made for over 1,500 years, and production has been concentrated on the Venetian island of Murano since the 13th century. 

The Prancing Horse (Italian: Cavallino Rampante, lit. ‘little prancing horse‘) is the symbol of Italian sports car manufacturer Ferrari and its racing division Scuderia Ferrari. Originally, the symbol was used by World War I pilot Francesco Baracca on his airplane.
Are these guys talented or what?

March 31, 2021: Tucker Carlson: Fox News.

This was removed by youtube. Here is half of it on “Real Clear Politics”

Posted by: bj | March 22, 2021

The Left Elects “This” to Run the Country

Capitol Investigation Seeks to Criminalize Political Dissent

The government’s response to the January 6 melee isn’t about justice. It’s about partisan retribution and revenge. And the consequences will be disastrous.By Julie Kelly – senior Contributor, American Greatness.

March 15, 2021

In the early hours of March 12, FBI agents in southwestern Florida barricaded a neighborhood to prepare to raid the home of one resident. Christopher Worrell of Cape Coral was arrested and charged with several counts related to the January 6 Capitol melee. Even though Worrell had been cooperating with the FBI for two months, the agency nonetheless unleashed a massive, and no doubt costly, display of force to take him into custody.

Law enforcement agents, according to one neighbor who spoke with a reporter, wore “whole outfits . . . like military and it was crazy. There was like six or seven . . . big black vehicles. They busted down the front door.” The raid included “armed men with helmets and a tanker truck” and was partially executed by the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force.

Worrell never entered the Capitol building on January 6; he isn’t accused of committing a violent crime. But a D.C. judge overturned a Florida judge’s ruling to release Worrell pending further review of his case. He remains in jail.

Ginning Up “Domestic Terrorism”

Worrell’s arrest is the latest in what the U.S. Department of Justice warned would be an “unprecedented” investigation leading to sedition charges filed against American citizens. Attorney General Merrick Garland pledged to make the Capitol Breach manhunt his top priority; on his first day in office, he received an update on the investigation from FBI Director Christopher Wray. Garland has compared January 6 to the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing that killed 168 people, including 15 children.

Roughly 300 people have been arrested so far, many of them transported to Washington, D.C. to await trial and dozens denied bail after federal prosecutors argued the defendants, including a high school senior from Georgia, pose a threat to the nation.

The Capitol Breach probe, the department’s official title, is a flagrant political prosecution targeting Trump supporters. Every display—from heavy-handed FBI raids to a militarized Washington, D.C.—is designed to portray the President Trump’s allies as domestic terrorists.

The differences between how the government is handling the January 6 defendants and other so-called protestors could not be more stark. For example, a Portland investigative reporter found the Justice Department has dropped more than one-third of the federal cases related to last summer’s riots in that city, with more to come. Only about a dozen people have been arrested for last week’s rioting in Portland, which included attacks on a federal courthouse. 

But the violence in Portland is different, according to Merrick Garland, who said during his confirmation hearing the Capitol attack was “domestic terrorism” because the January 6 protestors attempted “to disrupt democratic processes.” The term doesn’t apply to attacks on the Portland courthouse, Garland claimed, because those only happen at night when court is out of session.

Lucky Antifa.

Stretching the Law 

Garland’s explanation, however absurd it sounds to the majority of Americans, bolsters one of the Justice Department’s most widely-used allegations in its Capitol investigation. More than 75 protestors now face one count of “obstruction of an official proceeding.”

The temporary disruption of Congress’ attempt to certify the Electoral College results, a task completed 13 hours after the chaos began, is repeatedly cited in charging documents as evidence of wrongdoing: “It [is] a crime to corruptly obstruct, influence, or impede any official proceeding—to include a proceeding before Congress—or make an attempt to do so,” several affidavits read.

But the government’s attempt to apply this vague law to defendants in the Capitol case is a stretch, to say the least. In several instances, it represents an enhancement charge to add a felony to mostly misdemeanor offenses.

Further, there’s no indication the law pertains to a proceeding before Congress. Here’s the exact text from the statute prosecutors cite: “Whoever corruptly . . . otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.”

The provision is part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, signed into law in 2002 as a congressional response to the Enron and WorldCom scandals. Corporate bad actors—not regular citizens protesting the actions of their elected officials in a public government building paid for by taxpayers—are the proper targets of that law.

In his signing statement, President George W. Bush explicitly rebuked any intention to use the law against Americans. “To ensure that no infringement on the constitutional right to petition the Government for redress of grievances occurs in the enforcement of section 1512(c) . . . which among other things prohibits corruptly influencing any official proceeding, the executive branch shall construe the term ‘corruptly’ in section 1512(c)(2) as requiring proof of a criminal state of mind on the part of the defendant,” Bush said in July 2002.

No Speedy Trials

How will federal prosecutors convince a judge someone like Christopher Worrell, who never entered the building to try to stop Congress’s certification, had a “criminal state of mind” and wasn’t simply exercising his constitutional right to protest his own government? 

What Worrell and others did—those who didn’t commit crimes such as assault a police officer or vandalize property—is wholly American and well within the protections of the First Amendment.

Perhaps that explains why thousands of protestors who occupied the Hart Senate Office building in October 2018 to interrupt the confirmation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh didn’t face “obstruction of an official proceeding” charges. Ditto for those who surrounded and banged on the doors of the Supreme Court. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) was not accused of inciting an insurrection after she fired up the crowd that later stormed the Senate building and harassed U.S. senators.

Trump-hating thugs who tore up the nation’s capital during his 2017 inauguration also did not face extra charges for “obstruction of an official proceeding.” In fact, nearly all of the charges eventually were dropped by the same U.S. attorney’s office in D.C. now overseeing the Capitol riot investigation.

The burden of proof, to the extent it matters in the hyperpartisan Beltway justice system, is high. Nonetheless, it appears the Justice Department is having trouble building its cases, including “obstruction of an official proceeding” charges.

Last week, the government asked for permission to violate the Speedy Trial Act and grant a 60 day continuance in its case against nine defendants, alleged members of the Oath Keepers, all charged with obstructing an official proceeding among other offenses. The lawyers insist they need more time to assemble all the evidence. “[T]he ends of justice served by granting a request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.”

The judge agreed.

Convicting any of the Capitol defendants on charges of obstructing an official proceeding will cross a dangerous line—a line government prosecutors and federal judges clearly feel undeterred to cross. This isn’t about justice, it’s about partisan retribution and revenge. And the consequences will be disastrous.Share onTwitterFacebookParler

About Julie Kelly

Julie Kelly is a political commentator and senior contributor to American Greatness. She is the author of Disloyal Opposition: How the NeverTrump Right Tried―And Failed―To Take Down the President. Her past work can be found at The Federalist and National Review. She also has been featured in the Wall Street JournalThe HillChicago TribuneForbes, and Genetic Literacy Project. After college graduation, she served as a policy and communications consultant for several Republican candidates and elected officials in suburban Chicago. She also volunteered for her local GOP organization. After staying home for more than 10 years to raise her two daughters, Julie began teaching cooking classes out of her home. She then started writing about food policy, agriculture, and biotechnology, as well as climate change and other scientific issues. She graduated from Eastern Illinois University in 1990 with a degree in communications and minor degrees in political science and journalism. Julie lives in suburban Chicago with her husband, two daughters, and (unfortunately) three dogs.

Posted by: bj | March 17, 2021

Logic and Truisms

I Think this pretty much sums it up?

Thus, 94% of those deaths had other contributing factors. Yet, the Hospitals and medical facilities reporting these 94% deaths check the “died from Corona 19 box” to make sure they get US government payments of $15,000 to $20,000 per reported death.

Posted by: bj | March 16, 2021

Phenomenal Photos

From Very Patient Photographers

Posted by: bj | March 13, 2021

The Worlds Deadliest Virus: Communism

Monday: March 8, 2021: Fox News:

Definitions: Center of Disease Control (CDC), National Institute of Health (NIH), Chinese Communist Party (CCP)

Some parts of this video have been “bleeped out” (thanks to tube owned by google) but here is the short version;

2003…………..CDC patents Corona Virus (SARS); Either the Corona virus was manufactured making it illegal because it is illegal to patent a biological / chemical weapon; or it was natural occurring making it illegal, because US code makes it illegal to patent nature. In 2007 CDC filed petitions on its patents for confidentiality, detection and measurement, giving it (CDC) control and thus the means and motive for monetary gain to take the Corona Virus from a pathogen to a profit. In 2012 – 2013 the NIH had doubts it was doing ethical “GAIN of FUNCTION RESEARCH) and suggested (with a wink) the this research should be suspended. In 2015, when the ethics of the research becomes “hot” the NIH (Fauci) offshores the research and finds the Wuhan Laboratory in China $3.7 million of US $.

BLM is Causing Racial Strife to Overthrow the US Government, Destroy Capitalism and install Communism

This is incredible!!! The green dots on this Google Earth map represent radio stations all over the world.

Click on any one of the dots and you will immediately hear that station with very good reception. 

For example, halfway up Ireland’s east coast, there is a station playing Irish pub music.

Any of you who are multilingual will certainly enjoy this.


New NASA satellite data prove carbon dioxide is GREENING the Earth and restoring forests

Thursday, March 04, 2021 by: Ethan Huff 
Tags: agricultureatmospherecarbon dioxideclimate changeCO2environforestsglobal warminggoodclimategoodsciencegreenhouse gasesgreeningNASAPlantspollutionreforestationSaharaVegetation Index

Image: New NASA satellite data prove carbon dioxide is GREENING the Earth and restoring forests

(Natural News) The latest Vegetation Index data from NASA shows that the Earth is getting progressively “greener” and lusher over time.

The planet is 10 percent greener today than it was in 2000, NASA says, which means better conditions for growing crops. Forests are also expanding while deserts are becoming more fertile and usable for agriculture.

All in all, the global Vegetation Index rose from 0.0936 to 0.1029 between 2000 and 2021, a 9.94 percent increase.

“10 percent greening in 20 years! We are incredibly fortunate!” announced Zoe Phin, a researcher who compiled the data into a chart for her blog.

“I just wish everyone felt that way. But you know not everyone does. To the extent that humans enhance global greening is precisely what social parasites want to tax and regulate. No good deed goes unpunished.”

A separate German study found that the globe has been greening for at least the past three decades. Satellite imagery suggests that vegetation has been expanding at a growing rate, contracting the gloom-and-doom narrative being spread by the climate alarmists.

Back in 2018, research found that the Sahara Desert, the largest in the world, had shrunkby more than 8 percent over the past three decades. This is truly profound as the Sahara covers an expansive 9.2 million square kilometers of territory.

“Eight percent means more than 700,000 square kilometers more area that’s become green – an area almost as big as Germany and France combined,” reports P. Gosselin.

“So in terms of vegetation, the planet probably hasn’t had it this nice in about 1,000 years.”

“Global warming” is a good thing – it’s healing the planet!

Most of this greening is caused by greenhouse gases – you know, those “horrible” emissions that the climate fanatics insist are going to kill us all. Truth be told, greenhouse gases are making the planet more habitable for humans and other life forms.

One study calls this phenomenon carbon dioxide (CO2) fertilization, which is far more accurate than calling it CO2 “pollution” as many in the mainstream media continue to do.

By the year 2100, all this greening will offset 17 years’ worth of anthropogenic CO2 emissions, rendering all this “pollution” as if it never even happened. In other words, there will be only benefits and no drawbacks from all this “global warming” that is taking place.

“There are many more studies underpinning the good news of the greening planet – thanks in large part to mankind,” notes Gosselin. “It’s not as bad as the crybaby activists and media depict it to be. Not even close.”

The problem is that there is no money to be made from telling everyone that the planet is just fine, and to continue living as normal. There would be no “need” for a “green” shift away from fossil fuels, and no “need” to stop eating meat, among other such nonsense.

The powers that be have to keep the “climate change” ruse going in order to advance their globalist agenda. Without climate change, there would be no excuse to steal people’s freedoms and liberties while imposing hell on earth as the “solution” to all of these manufactured climate woes.

“Food security will always be a factor because as long as global population increases, so must global agricultural production increase. That said (the need for agricultural output to keep pace with population), by far the biggest threat to humanity, is NOT climate change,” wrote one commenter at

“The biggest threat to humanity and resulting environmental destruction that a global famine would bring is Climate Change policy – the UN’s Socialist-Marxist climate policy to destroy access to affordable, abundant fossil fuels necessary to sustain global agricultural output.”
The graphic shows dollar amount, origin and destination, state to state and county to county.
This also shows capital flow out of the cities to rural counties.  

Posted by: bj | March 3, 2021

AOC Shows She’s an Absolute Moron (Again)

AOC Shows She’s an Absolute Moron (Again)

By Bonchie | Mar 03, 2021 1:15 PM ET  Share  Tweet 

Greg Nash/Pool via AP

The obsession with Denmark by American socialists is an odd one. We’ve seen the country mentioned many times in debates, on cable news, and in other venues where people are attempting to talk down capitalism. While doing so, they continually ignore all the context regarding Denmark’s economy, making wild pronouncements about its supposedly utopian environment.

Here was Sen. Bernie Sanders a month ago showing he has the economic understanding of your average poodle.

Now, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, being the brilliant mind that she is, decided to weigh in with the same argument. Apparently, she doesn’t have an original bone in her body and just lifted Sanders’ talking point.

What’s utterly embarrassing is a member of Congress being this economically illiterate, and to prove my point, let’s go through some facts about Denmark.

One, Denmark does not have a national minimum wage. Yes, you read that right. Any wage floors are regionally negotiated because that makes way more sense than mandating a single minimum that may be impossible in places were the cost of living is less. AOC is using a country without a minimum wage to stump for a minimum wage increase. The mind boggles. It’s likely she didn’t bother to do the least bit of research before popping off with her socialist mad libs on Twitter.

Let’s also talk about Denmark’s tax rates. Someone making $10/hr at a rural McDonalds in the United States has an effective income tax rate of essentially 0%. In fact, they probably qualify for credits. In Denmark, someone making $22/hr pays an effective tax rate of 32% on that income. Further, Denmark has a 25% VAT tax on goods and services. Sales tax in the United States is typically falls between $0.07-$0.10 on the dollar depending on what state you are in. To make matters even worse for AOC’s point, the cost of living in Denmark is about 28% higher than the United States.

Now, take $22/hr but factor in a 32% income tax with a 28% higher cost of living (including a 25% VAT tax) and what you see is that the $22/hr number compared to workers in the United States is highly misleading. Of course, AOC doesn’t choose to share any of those details because they’d destroy her point.

It’s also important to understand how a Denmark McDonald’s is fundamentally different from one in the United States. They don’t have drive-thrus, for example. That means they require less workers. Automated ordering kiosks are already in place. That gives stores there the ability to pay less people more money.

Lastly, let’s note that Denmark has a very strict immigration system. That makes it possible to keep their welfare state at somewhat manageable levels. A country with only 5 million people and a homogenous culture is far easier to run. Does AOC support Denmark style immigration restrictions? Of course she doesn’t because that would require some level of critical assessment.

Given all these facts, I’m still not going to make some definitive statement that the wage for a McDonald’s worker in Denmark is actually the same as the United States. Cost of living obviously depends on what you choose to buy, for example. How the stores operate there vs. in America is also a huge factor. What I can say is that pronouncing that McDonald’s workers make $22/hr in Denmark leaves out a lot crucial context and detail that, when taken into account, make things much closer than they appear.

Regardless, if AOC wants to be like Denmark, she should be stumping for no minimum wage, sky-high tax rates for the working class, and a strict immigration system. What she doesn’t get to do is continue to use Denmark as an example of her policy goals when the facts simple tell a far different story than what she’s presenting. Share  Tweet 

Joe Biden Speaks in Houston, What Follows Should Make You Question Everything

Food for DEEP Thought…        I found these numbers interesting. 
  As reported by the CDC … Here are the US deaths by year and the change from the previous year.  Year 2017:    2,818,503 Americans died   Year 2018:   2,839,205 deaths (20,702 more than the previous year 2017)   Year 2019:   2,855,000 deaths (16,300 more than the previous year 2018)   The year of the pandemic …   Year 2020:   2,913,144 deaths (57,641 more than the previous year 2019)   

BUT WAIT: There were zero deaths from Covid-19 during 2018, and 2019 and the jump from 2019 to 2020 was only 57,641

I’ve been told that COVID is responsible now for 400,000 + deaths. Shouldn’t the 2020 number be a hell of a lot higher?  So the question becomes: How many people died OF COVID and How many died (of other causes) WITH COVID?  Now read below:   

Food for thought:   A very well-orchestrated plan, or an unimaginable set of events that just fell into place with the United States front and center.  You tell me!!  Scare people with a virus, force them to wear masks and place them in quarantine.  Count the number of dead every second of every day, in every News Headline.  By the way, ninety-nine and eight-tenths of the people who get the virus, recover.  About one to two tenths of one percent who get the virus, die.  Most all of them have other medical problems.  Did you catch that?  Less than 1/2 of a percent die.   Close businesses = 35,000,000+ instantly unemployed.   Remove entertainment and prohibit recreation, Closing parks, gyms, bars, restaurants, sports.  No dating.  No touching.  Isolate people.  Dehumanize them.   Close Temples and Churches – prohibit worship.  Create a vacuum and let depression, anxiety, hopelessness, and desperation set in.  Then… ignite hatred and civil unrest, creating Civil War.   Empty the prisons because of the virus and fill the streets with criminals.   Send in Antifa and BLM to vandalize property, as if they are freedom fighters.   Undermine the law.  Riot, Loot and Attack all Law Enforcement, but tell government to order a stand-down.  Then… Defund Law Enforcement and abolish Police.  

Are We are all being played by those who want to destroy America!  This is how you destroy a Nation from within, and in very short order.  Will it work?  I guess that depends on you and me.   

Author Unknown:…… … but it needs to be shared.  I just did.  Your turn.

These irresponsible people in congress represent the People; Not Special Interests. Get rid of them. There is already $1 trillion appropriated for corona virus Stimulation (from Trump) waiting to be spent. This will cause massive inflation. The Left is bankrupting the Country.

I guess it is only in the private sector that things have to be
self- supporting.  Have we now passed the point of no return?

Now you will know why Republicans are blocking this 2.2
trillion-dollar congressional bill. Hard to believe but look it up on
the Congressional website for HR 748 from 116th Congress. Here’s the
direct link:

American population: 330,483,530
Stimulus bill: $2,000,000,000,000 ($2 Trillion)
Dividing the cost by every American is $6,051.74 The government could
have given every person over $6,000, but instead will give $1,200 to
each adult under a certain income. Want to know where the missing 96%
of your tax dollars went?  Here you go:

1.        $300,000,000 for Migrant and Refugee Assistance pg.. 147.

2.        $10,000 per person for student loan bailout.

3.        $100,000,000 to NASA, because, who knows why.

4.        $20,000,000,000 to the USPS, because why the hell not.

5.        $300,000,000 to the Endowment for the Arts - because of it.

6.        $300,000,000 for the Endowment for the Humanities/ because
no one even knew that was a thing.

7.        $15,000,000 for Veterans Employment Training / for when the
GI Bill isn't enough.

8.        $435,000,000 for mental health support.

9.        $30,000,000,000 for the Department of Education
stabilization fund/ because that will keep people employed (all those
zeros can be confusing, that’s $30 BILLION).

10.     $200,000,000 to Safe Schools Emergency Response to Violence Program.

11.     $300,000,000 to Public Broadcasting / NPR has to be bought by
the Democrats.

12.     $500,000,000 to Museums and Libraries / Who the hell knows how
we are going to use it.

13.     $720,000,000 to Social Security Admin / but get this only
200,000,000 is to help people. The rest is for admin costs.

14.     $25,000,000 for Cleaning supplies for the Capitol Building / I
kid you not it's on page 136.

15.     $7,500,000 to the Smithsonian for additional salaries.

16.     $35,000,000 to the JFK Center for Performing Arts.

17.     $25,000,000 for additional salary for House of Representatives.

18.     $3,000,000,000 upgrade to the IT department at the VA.

19.     $315,000,000 for State Department Diplomatic Programs.

20.     $95,000,000 for the Agency of International Development.

21.     $300,000,000 for International Disaster Assistance.

22.     $90,000,000 for the Peace Corp pg. 148.

23.     $13,000,000 to Howard University pg. 121.

24.     $9,000,000 Misc. Senate Expenses pg. 134.

25.     $100,000,000 to Essential Air carriers pg. 162. This of note
because the Airlines are going to need billions in loans to keep them
afloat  ($100,000,000 is chump change.)

26.     $40,000,000,000 goes to the Take Responsibility to Workers and
Families Act This sounds like it's direct payments for workers pg.

27.     $1,000,000,000 Airlines Recycle and Save Program pg. 163

28.     $25,000,000 to the FAA for administrative costs pg. 165

29.     $492,000,000 to National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) pg. 167

30.     $526,000,000 Grants to Amtrak to remain available if needed
through 2021 pg. 168 (what are the odds that doesn't go unused) Hidden
on page 174 the Secretary has 7 days to allocate the funds & notify

31.     $25,000,000,000 for Transit Infrastructure pg. 169

32.     $3,000,000 Maritime Administration pg. 172

33.     $5,000,000 Salaries and Expensive Office of the Inspector
General pg. 172

34.     $2,500,000 Public and Indian Housing pg. 175

35.     $5,000,000 Community Planning and Development pg. 175

36.  $2,500,000 Office of Housing

From OANN: February 20, 2021: 30:55

Former President Trump broke his radio silence and called into Fox News for his first interview since leaving office to pay tribute to Rush Limbaugh after his passing away from cancer was announced earlier today on his radio show by his wife.

Trump called “Outnumbered” on Wednesday to remember and honor one of the greatest and most beloved talk radio personalities America has ever known. The former president had spoken to Limbaugh there or four days ago and he noted that Limbaugh had been in bad shape for some time. “He, in theory, could have been gone four months ago, really,” Trump stated. “He was a fighter.”

Limbaugh was 70-years-old. He had been diagnosed with stage IV lung cancer in January of 2020. His wife Kathryn has been steadfastly at his side since the diagnosis and millions of Americans were praying for remission. But Limbaugh’s battle ended on Wednesday with his wife by his side. Trump noted how Limbaugh was always speaking fondly of his wife and noting how well she took care of him.

Trump went on to praise the radio legend further by saying that people “respected him even if they didn’t like him.” “He is a legend. He really is. There aren’t too many legends around. But he is a legend,” Trump proclaimed. “And those people who listen to him every day, it was like a religious experience for a lot of people.”

Video Credit: Fox News

Trump and Limbaugh became friends during the former president’s 2016 campaign. “He was a unique guy, and he became a friend of mine,” Trump proudly stated.

“I didn’t know Rush at all, I had barely met him,” he recalled. “Without ever having met him or talked to him or had lunch with him, he was right with me from the beginning.”

Trump gave credit where it was due, calling Limbaugh “something special” and noting that it was the renowned conservative who helped him emerge as the leader from the GOP primary. “Rush felt very early that we were going to win, before the escalator ride, if you wanna know the truth,” Trump reminisced.

Trump spoke briefly about the election and how Limbaugh firmly believed that he had won.

He also went on to speak about what a great golfer Limbaugh was. “He was a strong guy, physically very strong, he hit the ball a long way.”

Trump also spoke of Limbaugh and his work ethic: “Rush is irreplaceable, unique. He had an audience that was massive. … He would get up in the show and just talk. He wouldn’t take phone calls, where people would call in every two minutes. That’s sort of easy to do. He would just talk for two hours or three hours, just talk,” Trump said. “That’s not an easy thing to do. I once asked him, I said, ‘Do you study for the show?’ He said, ‘Actually, I study very hard,’ which a little bit surprised me. He was a fantastic man, a fantastic talent. People, whether they loved him or not, they respected him. They really did.”

Condolences and tributes poured in for Rush Limbaugh after the news broke.

Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton tweeted: “Rush Limbaugh was a giant. With his straightforward, simple articulation of conservatism, he inspired millions. He was one-of-a-kind and he will be missed.”

We’d like to report a murder’: Trump attorney Michael van der Veen just DECIMATES the media during CBS interview (watch)

Posted at 8:34 am on February 14, 2021 by Sam J.

It’s not often we can say, ‘this video speaks for itself’ but BOY HOWDY, this video of Trump attorney Michael van der Veen’s CBS interview does indeed speak for itself.

And very loudly and painfully.

Yup, he nailed the media.

She did what they always do with anything Trump or conservative-related. That sideways, smug, condescending tone where they think they’re the smartest one in the room and in this case she definitely was not.

It really feels like MVDV speaks for most of us with his obvious disgust and disdain not only for her behavior but the media in general.

February 11, 2021  Constitutional NobodyPolitics

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis on Wednesday did not mince words on a congested conference call with Biden and federal health authorities who are seeking to prohibit domestic travel to and from the Sunshine State. DeSantis and Biden exchanged salvos of biting barbs after the criminal president said the federal government had authority to “restrict movement” of the people.

Citing concerns over the widespread proliferation of Covid-19 variants, Biden said he might have to prohibit vehicle and air traffic until the CDC and NIH were confident that currently available vaccinations had a proven efficacy against emerging strains, such as highly transmissible anomalies from the United Kingdom, Brazil, and South Africa.

Also on the call were “Deep State” Dr. Fauci and acting CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, both of whom championed Biden’s idea and told DeSantis that surging cases in Florida threatened to undermine the federal government’s expansive efforts to mitigate spread across the country. Florida, Dr. Fauci said, was the epicenter of Covid-19 mutations, and argued that new variants accounted for between 15-35% of new cases in Florida.

Walensky argued on the call that any attempt by DeSantis to resist a federally mandated travel ban would be immoral, selfish, and possibly illegal.

Biden echoed her words, and he berated DeSantis for having left Florida’s economy open during “the dark days of Covid.” Moreover, Biden claimed he had unilateral and constitutional authority to protect the nation’s health from “rogue politicians” acting in contravention of established health guidelines.

DeSantis’s initial reply was brief and blunt: “I will not comply,” he said, and then cited the CDC’s own statistics showing a nationwide decline in active Covid-19 cases.

Florida had arrested the spread of Covid-19, DeSantis argued, and accused Biden of targeting Republican states that supported Donald Trump.

“Florida absolutely will not comply,” DeSantis repeated. “Instituting a travel ban or restriction of movement would be a gross example of federal overreach with no grounding in law or science. We have Covid-19 in check, and you’re trying to exert unlawful authority over our state and its people,” he chided Biden.

Biden then tacitly threatened to withhold federal funding and to deny Florida access to Covid-19 vaccinations.

“C’mon, man, Florida needs our help, and you need vaccines, which are hard to come by, isn’t that right, Dr. Fauci,” Biden said.

The “Deep State” doctor replied in the affirmative, telling DeSantis that he expects the prevalence of the UK variant to double or triple every week to 10 days.

“Governor, do you want to be responsible for reinfecting the nation? Truth is, we don’t even know how effective current vaccines are against the UK strain.”

DeSantis told Dr. Fauci he trusted his own state health authorities over financially incentivized federal officials.

“How much do you stand to earn from these vaccines, Dr. Fauci? And, Joe, if you continue with this course of action, I will authorize the state National Guard to protect the movement of Floridians,” DeSantis said.

“Address me as Mr. President or President Biden,” Biden said.

“I will not, and you can go fuck yourself,” DeSantis said before hanging up.

In closing, it seems obvious that Team Biden favors perpetual lockdowns and a stagnant economy, keeping Americans imprisoned under a de facto state of medical martial law.

The post Gov. DeSantis Tells Biden: “Go Fuck Yourself” appeared first on Real Raw News.

Pretty Much Irrefutable Proof. If this happened in NH, with Dominion Voting machines, a Republican Stronghold, what are the odds it also happened in the toss-up states: Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Arizona, Texas, Georgia, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and North Carolina. I would say 100% Probability.

We need a nation wide investigation to insure election integrity in the 2020 and future elections.

(Republican Insider) – There have been some rather significant updates to the current battle going on in different key battleground states concerning the possibility of voter fraud that took place during the 2020 election and resulted in former President Donald Trump being cheated out of a second term in the White House. 

According to Gateway Pundit, there is some new information to go along with a report they published on their website on Wednesday of this week concerning voter fraud in the state of New Hampshire. They previously reported that a recent hand recount revealed that every GOP candidate in Windham, New Hampshire was shorted by 300 votes by Dominion-owned voting machines. 

The folks over at GP then spoke with Dr. David Strang M.D., who is the Belknap County Republican Committee State Committee Member for the New Hampshire Republican Party.

David said that the GOP candidates in Windham had a total of 6 percent of their overall votes removed by the Dominion machines. Strang also said that these same Dominion-owned machines are used in around 85 percent of the towns in the state. 

This makes the results of the 2020 election all the more suspect in New Hampshire, especially when you take into consideration the fact that Republicans actually turned the state red in their Senate for a total of 14 seats to 10 in 2020.

The GOP also flipped the House red by taking 213-187 majority. And yet, somehow, despite Republicans winning such huge victories in New Hampshire, Joe Biden, who was 4th in the overall primary, managed to beat former President Trump 52.7 to 45.4?

Something about that seems suspect, don’t you think? Well, if Strang is right, then Democrats managed to skim 6 percent of the vote off the top of every Republican candidate in races where there was a recount, thus enabling Biden to take a victory that he did not earn. If this happened in New Hampshire, it likely happened elsewhere. 

All we really want is to have these incidents and claims investigated and evaluated. That does not seem that unreasonable, right? We just want to protect the integrity of our election system to ensure every vote and very voice counts. 

As of right now, NH Attorney General Anne Edwards, who is a Republican, has not indicated that there will be an investigation into claims of voter fraud. It’s up to the folks of New Hampshire to put pressure on the attorney general by calling her office and demanding she launch an investigation into this matter. 

BLM is an Avowed Communist Organization

You Can’t Make this stuff up.



A One World Communist Government (controlled by the elite) Versus Individual Freedom

TIME Mag: “Trump Was Right. There Was A Conspiracy… Well-Funded Cabal, Powerful People Changing Laws, Steering Media & Controlling Information.”

Time Magazine has published intricate details of what they deem “a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs. Both surprises were the result of an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans.”

The article even confirms both The National Pulse’s reporting on former Obama lawyer Ian Bassin, as well as’s assertion of the involvement of Norm Eisen in what amounted to a major admission of a globalist set up to leverage the coronavirus, mail-in voting, and corporate interest to oust President Trump from office.

In a 6500-word article, author Molly Ball lays out how it all happened:

The handshake between business and labor was just one component of a vast, cross-partisan campaign to protect the election–an extraordinary shadow effort… Their work touched every aspect of the election. They got states to change voting systems and laws and helped secure hundreds of millions in public and private funding.

Time Magazine is scarcely a right-wing website, and the article goes to lengths to make excuses on behalf of the “shadow” campaign, they claim: “The scenario the shadow campaigners were desperate to stop was not a Trump victory. It was an election so calamitous that no result could be discerned at all…”

But the piece concedes “much of this activity took place on the left.”

Time alleges campaigners “successfully pressured social media companies to take a harder line against disinformation and used data-driven strategies to fight viral smears.”

By the eighth paragraph, Ball quotes Norm Eisen, who in early September 2020 the website described as the “Legal hatchet man and central operative in the “color revolution” against President Trump.”

By the eleventh, they note the efforts of Ian Bassin, who The National Pulse exclusively reported on – also in September.

Ball writes that “participants” like Eisen and Bassin now “want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.”

Ball identifies Mike Podhorzer, political director at AFL-CIO, as “the architect” of the conspiracy.

Changing American Elections Forever.

“The first task was overhauling America’s balky election infrastructure,” Time states, with particular focus on what Phil Kline and the Amistad Project had brought to the attention of the world with the assistance of The National Pulse in October.

They admit: An assortment of foundations contributed tens of millions in election-administration funding. The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative chipped in $300 million.

The story directly echoes The National Pulse reporting from October 6th, though doesn’t credit the article which stated at the time: “The group recently received $250 million from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, and the significant majority of the sum has been funneled into Democratic districts.”

Using George Floyd.

The death of George Floyd was also cynically leveraged for political ends, the article claims: The racial-justice uprising sparked by George Floyd’s killing in May was not primarily a political movement. The organizers who helped lead it wanted to harness its momentum for the election without allowing it to be co-opted by politicians. Many of those organizers were part of Podhorzer’s network, from the activists in battleground states who partnered with the Democracy Defense Coalition to organizations with leading roles in the Movement for Black Lives.

And the claim is even made that campaigners should be used for their votes and those they could bring with them in their communities, but not to let them anywhere near the levers of power aka politicians.

Big Business.

Then, America’s big corporates stepped in: While the AFL-CIO and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce pretend to be at each other’s throats, they reality is much of the back and forth is kabuki theater. The article confirms as much:

Neil Bradley, the Chamber’s executive vice president and chief policy officer… wanted to send a broader, more bipartisan message. He reached out to Podhorzer, through an intermediary both men declined to name. Agreeing that their unlikely alliance would be powerful, they began to discuss a joint statement pledging their organizations’ shared commitment to a fair and peaceful election.

The stage was set for the conspiracy to be carried out: In effect, big business, big activist groups, big unions, and big media would collaborate to keep President Trump away from office and keep reporting on the steal off the airwaves and social media.

And while the article continues to claim the activists were not trying to stop Trump winning but rather guarantee a fair election, one line gives the whole thing away.

Ball reveals an 11pm Zoom call on election night wherein – when President Trump was in the lead – Podhorzer stepped in to calm his colleagues down:

“Podhorzer presented data to show the group that victory was in hand.”

And he told Time something very true: “I don’t think the Trump campaign had a backup plan.”

The article even claims that grassroots conservative activists came close to rumbling the plan, especially in Michigan, where observers were locked out of the counting room and placards placed on windows to stop them seeing inside.

Claiming Credit.

The rationale for the article is simple, and even contained within the piece:

As I was reporting this article in November and December, I heard different claims about who should get the credit for thwarting Trump’s plot.

Liberals argued the role of bottom-up people power shouldn’t be overlooked, particularly the contributions of people of color and local grassroots activists.

Others stressed the heroism of GOP officials like Van Langevelde and Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffensperger, who stood up to Trump at considerable cost. The truth is that neither likely could have succeeded without the other.

In other words, now the constituent parts are trying to claim credit, and along they way, they’ve said the quiet part out loud.

Frontline Doctors: Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer’ than COVID-19

Physicians’ white paper says injection prohibited for the young and at least discouraged for healthy individuals under 70 years of age. ‘Unethical’ to advocate vaccine for persons under 50.

January 29, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — In an extraordinary recent presentation exposing “the serious and life-threatening disinformation campaign” being waged against the American people and the world, Dr. Simone Gold of the American Frontline Doctors (AFLD) laid out the facts on the Wuhan Virus, safe highly-effective treatments, and particularly what she calls “experimental biological agents,” otherwise referred to as the COVID-19 vaccines.  

Dr. Gold referred listeners to two AFLD websites where they can access a white paper produced by the AFLD physicians that provides thorough explanations and references for her presentation. Gold concluded her presentation with a passionate appeal for everyone to sign and spread a petition against authoritarian movements aimed at coercing individuals into receiving these injections.

The group’s white paper brings an array of crucial information together and is clear, accessible and well-documented. It reflects not only a depth of competence and great facility on the topics but a resolute commitment to truth and a deep fidelity to the noble mission of providing sound medical care for patients while defending the common good at large.

Highlights of the paper and Dr. Gold’s presentation include the following:

Correct language is ‘critical’: Not COVID-19 ‘vaccines,’ but experimental biological agents

Dr. Gold insists that even the designation of the new products as vaccines is inapprorpriate.

“Definitely you should not be calling this the ‘COVID-19 vaccines,’” she says. “The reason is, whatever you call it, it’s experimental. It’s not been approved as a vaccine. It’s currently in its investigational stage.”

The initial FAQ of the white paper explains, “According to the Food and Drug Administration, ‘An investigational drug can also be called an experimental drug and is being studied to see if your disease or medical condition improves while taking it.’  Pfizer and Moderna and AstraZeneca applications properly identify their new agents as ‘investigational,’ which is normal at this very early stage of development.”SUBSCRIBEto LifeSite’s daily headlinesSUBSCRIBEU.S. Canada World Catholic

The paper goes on to confirm that this experimental status means that “adverse events will be settled under the legal standard for experimental medications.”

As part of this experimental status, Dr. Gold explained, “If you take the vaccine, you’re being enrolled in a pharmocol vigilance tracking system. It means you have enrolled yourself in a medical trial … most people are not aware that that’s what they’re doing. This pharmocol vigilance tracking system tracks you for (at least) two years, it’s set up by the Department of Defense, it was handed off to Oracle and Google to put the data together. How is it that people want to sign up for this system on an experimental (biological agent)?” she asked.

Thus, the founder of AFLD affirmed these injected treatments are “most properly called experimental biological agents. … We need to call this by its proper name. Never talk about this without the word ‘experimental.’  That’s critical,” she said.

‘Wuhan Virus’ to ‘COVID-19’

In the presentation, Dr. Gold called the massive “disinformation campaign” on these topics “a crime against humanity” and stated, “You must understand the magnitude of the lie in order to understand what they are trying to tell you about these experimental vaccines.”

As the paper observed, “from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic,” there has been “massive disinformation” beginning with its very name.  

Initially, and naturally, the pandemic was referred to as the “Wuhan Virus” since “epidemics have historically been named for the location from where they arise or are associated. Consider: Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, Spanish Flu, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, Lyme Disease,” they wrote.

But this name was massively “rebranded” to “COVID-19” due to the displeasure of the Chinese Communist Party with the original name.— Article continues below Petition —PETITION: No to mandatory vaccination for the coronavirus 

Greatest disinformation: Hydroxychloroquine

The paper documented in some depth the “(m)ost notable” disinformation regarding the pandemic, which “was selling the lie to the American and European people that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an unsafe medication.” They detailed how the lie was advanced by “Scientists,” the “Media & The Elite,” “Big Tech Censorship,” and with “Government Punishment of Doctors.”

As HCQ is “considered one of the safest medications in the world, safer than Motrin or Tylenol,” it has been broadly used outside the west with great success. For example, in response to the virus, both China and India mandated or recommended HCQ for its population early last year, and at least India, “continues to enjoy a death rate a fraction (~10 percent) of the USA even in the most densely populated slums.”

“So in America the death rates are in the 800 range per million,” Dr. Gold explained. “In Africa, Sub-Sahara Africa, the poorest places in the world, no social distancing, no mask, no ICU’s, they have a death rate of one percent the western nations. One percent!”

“Now I believe it is due to widely available HCQ. I don’t think you can explain it for any other reason,” she said.

The paper provided thorough documentation on  how “(c)ountries where HCQ is widely available, which are typically third world countries that have malaria or citizens who travel to malaria-endemic regions, have 1-10 percent of the death rates of first world nations where HCQ is severely restricted.”

Extremely high survival rate / low infection fatality rate for Wuhan Virus

“The most enduring myth regarding COVID-19,” the doctors wrote, “is that this is a highly lethal infection. It is not. The data is unequivocal:

  • COVID-19 kills very rarely and is mostly limited to the medically fragile,
  • COVID-19 is less deadly than influenza in children,
  • COVID-19 is similar lethality in the middle adult years and treatable.”

They went on to cite the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) own “best estimate” to demonstrate that the infection fatality rate (IFR) is overall very low: 

  • 0-19 years old: 0.00003 (99.997 percent survival rate)
  • 20-49 years old: 0.0002 (99.98 percent survival rate)
  • 50-69 years old: 0.005 (99.5 percent survival rate)
  • 70+ years old: 0.054 (94.6 percent survival rate)

Further, in the presentation, Dr. Gold emphasized that these very high survival rates reflect cases where people have not received treatment with HCQ, or another “miracle” drug, ivermectin, and thus with such simple, inexpensive treatments, they would be much higher still. Gold referenced the testimony of doctors before a U.S. Senate committee in November who said if such treatments had been available, very high numbers of lives could have been saved.

In the paper, the doctors observed, “It is quite clear that young people are at a statistically insignificant risk of death from COVID-19,” and for most people under 65, “the risk of dying from COVID-19 isn’t much higher than from getting in a car accident driving to work.”

Safety concerns for experimental vaccines

In contrast to the utilization of safe treatments like HCQ and ivermectin, there are many significant safety concerns with these experimental vaccines.  

Brand new mRNA technology

First, what the doctors call the “largest experimental medication program in our history” uses a brand-new technology utilizing messenger RNA.  “No vaccine” based on this technology “has ever been approved for any disease, or even entered final-stage trials until now, so there’s no peer-reviewed published human data to compare how mRNA stacks up against older technologies,” AFLD said.

No independently published animal studies

Further, previous coronavirus vaccines developed over decades have consistently failed in animal trials with the death of their subjects. Yet, these experimental vaccines have no independently published animal studies.

“Vaccine safety requires proper animal trials and peer-reviewed data,” the paper stated, “neither of which has occurred” with these experimental biological agents.

Recipient may become more vulnerable to virus

The AFLD White Paper stated that one of the greatest safety concerns relates to how “(p)rior coronavirus (and other respiratory) vaccines have failed due to the scientific phenomena known as pathogenic priming that makes the vaccine recipient more likely to suffer a sudden fatal outcome due to massive cytokine storm when exposed to the wild virus.”

Of note, current reports revealed that hundreds of individuals injected with COVID-19 experimental vaccines have been admitted to the hospital, and the shots have so far been linked to at least 181 deaths in the United States.

Neurological diseases, long-term effects

The paper listed many other possible complications, including neurological diseases, and cited from the “extremely limited COVID-19 vaccine data” instances of them already occurring.  

There is also no data on sub-categories of the population, including the elderly, women who desire to get pregnant, those who have had the Wuhan Virus already, and since these experimental agents are brand new, “we cannot know any long-term effects.”


In addition, these chemicals may impact a woman’s fertility. The paper explained that the “mechanism of action of the experimental mRNA vaccines includes a possible auto-immune rejection of the placenta. In layman’s terms, the vaccine may permanently interfere with a woman’s ability to maintain a pregnancy.”

“The vaccine companies themselves acknowledge the possibility of ill effects on a pregnancy on the vaccine bottle, which says the following: ‘it is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA VaccineBNT162b2 has an impact on fertility,’” the doctors wrote.

Dr. Gold emphasized, “I would never let a woman of child-bearing age take this.  I would fight tooth and nail (to prevent it), under no circumstances, until this placenta question is answered.”

Manufactures have no liability

Of great concern as well is the fact that the companies that produce these experimental biological agents “are immune from all liability” due to the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Therefore, those who are injured or even the families of those who suffer death due to these injections will have no claim on the manufacturers themselves. 

Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer’ than the Wuhan Virus

AFLD then drew from common sense to conclude that taking an experimental vaccine “is not safer” than a very low IFR for the Wuhan Virus. Besides the “extraordinarily low” mortality rates, doctors are “getting better and better at treating COVID-19: the death rate in terms of population continues to fall, hospital stays for COVID-19 get shorter and hospital mortality from COVID-19 plummets.”

While not directly asserting that the experimental vaccines are unsafe, AFLD clarified that “We are saying that by definition it is unsafe to widely distribute an experimental vaccine, because taking a vaccine is completely different than taking an ordinary medication.”

“In contrast to taking a medication for an actual disease,” they explained, “the person who takes a vaccine is typically completely healthy and would continue to be healthy without the vaccine. As the first rule of the Hippocratic Oath is: do no harm, vaccine safety must be guaranteed. That has not yet happened.”

No proof that the experimental vaccines stop transmission of the virus

The doctors highlighted that there is no data on whether or not these experimental agents are actually capable of stopping the transmission of the virus. They affirmed that the “scientists are very upfront about the fact that they don’t know if the vaccine even stops the spread of the virus!”

They cited a Medscape article that quotes a former FDA official who said, “(w)e don’t know if people can become infected and thus also transmit even with vaccination.” For this reason, “people can expect to still be wearing masks, still be asked to follow non-pharmaceutical public health measures that we’ve all come to know so well.”

In dismay, Dr. Gold explained this point in her presentation, saying, “What is super shocking is that there is no proof that this biological agent actually stops the transmission among people.  It’s like a joke, this is like the punch line to a joke, ‘let’s take a vaccine, and by the way it doesn’t actually stop transmission.’ I mean, I don’t even know what to say to that!”

AFLD recommendations regarding COVID-19 experimental vaccines

Based on the IFR by age, along with real potential dangers, AFLD came up with recommendations for who should not submit themselves to these experimental biological agents and who may have an option to.

In summary, they stated, that such injections are “Prohibited for the young, Discouraged for the healthy middle-aged and Optional for the co-morbid and elderly.”

Dr. Gold commented, “If you are under age 20, the experimental vaccine is prohibited, in our opinion, absolutely prohibited. We simply don’t know enough about its effects on fertility, and we do know that this virus, essentially does not affect young people. Essentially,” with regards to young people, COVID-19 is “irrelevant!”

“From age 20 to 50, if you are healthy, we strongly discourage,” your receiving this experimental agent, she said. “There is an exceedingly low risk,” as well.

In their white paper, the AFLD summarized their advice to different sections of the population regarding the vaccines.

a. 0-20: prohibited(exceedingly low risk from COVID, unknown risk of auto-immune disease, unknown risk of pathogenic priming, risk of lifelong infertility) 

b. 20-50 healthy: strongly discouraged (exceedingly low risk from COVID, unknown risk of auto-immune disease, unknown risk of pathogenic priming, risk of lifelong infertility) 

c. 50-69 & healthy: strongly discouraged (low risk from COVID, unknown risk of auto-immune disease, unknown risk of pathogenic priming, unknown effect on placenta and spermatogenesis)

d. 50-69 & co-morbid: discouraged (experimental vaccine is higher risk than early or prophylactic treatment with established medications) 

e. >70 & healthy: personal risk assessment (experimental vaccine is higher risk than early or prophylactic treatment with established medications) 

f. >70 & co-morbid: personal risk assessment & advocacy access (experimental vaccine early or prophylactic treatment with established medications) 

The doctors concluded, “In medicine, the guiding principle is ‘First, do no harm.’ Widely distributing a COVID-19 experimental vaccine before adequately addressing and clinically evaluating the above concerns is reckless.”

Indeed, they charge that it is, in fact, “unethical to advocate for the vaccine to persons under 50. The risk and safety evidence based upon trials cannot be justified in younger persons. It is therefore prohibited.”

They also promised to do everything they can to assist injured plaintiffs who sue pharmaceutical companies, private businesses or government agencies who mandate or coerce “persons to comply with unethical policies for which there is substantial evidence of likely harm.”

Call to action: Sign and spread the petition

In response to projected vaccine mandates, Dr. Gold announced, “We intend to fight the urge that’s sweeping the globe to mandate people taking an experimental biological agent.”  

AFLD is not primarily concerned with the government, but with private businesses mandating these injections, particularly schools and airlines.

“We intend to talk to the decision-makers in the airline industry,” she said. “One of our tools in that battle will be to go in armed with at least, at least, one million signatures of human beings who are going to say ‘no, we are not going to do business with anybody, and we are not going to fly with anyone who is going to mandate (experimental vaccines).’”

She encouraged everyone to “go to and sign the petition. You also must share that petition with everyone. Do not be shy! … it is your obligation. I’ve done my part, my doctors have done their part, you must do your part.”

“Not only do you sign it, (but) each of you should take it on yourself to say, ‘I’m going to make sure I get a thousand signatures’,” she said.

Gold also encouraged those who are in a union to build advocacy against these injections within their union.

And finally, she reminded her audience, “ALWAYS use the word ‘EXPERIMENTAL’ when you talk about this. Always!”

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page.  View it here.


YouTube bans Frontline Doctors speech criticizing ‘experimental agent’ COVID vaccine 

Physicians: ‘Masks don’t control viruses, they control you,’ ‘pandemic is over’

Former Pfizer VP: ‘No need for vaccines,’ ‘the pandemic is effectively over’

US ‘frontline’ doctors’ website exposes ‘criminal’ campaign by tech giants, govt agencies to block COVID med

Why are Google, Facebook, Twitter so bent on censoring doctors who promote cure for COVID?

January 24, 2021: 30:

Dr. Fauci has been with (NIH), The National Institute of Health since 1965.

For the Complete Corona Virus Story Listen from 00:00 to 20:22

Posted by: bj | January 24, 2021

No More Bohemian Grove?

The Werff Report and FBI Confirms these reports:

Here is the Proof!

Posted by: bj | January 23, 2021

Lin Wood: Is on and Records a Zoom Call

January 23, 2021: On Rumble: FBI, CIA, NSA, DOJ will not tell us all the facts, maybe this is the beginning.

As ace trial attorney, Reiner Fuellmich says in his powerful video presentation, COVID is a Crime Against Humanity, the only pandemic we’ve ever suffered is a phony PCR-testing pandemic. Read Details Below the link and then Click on link below to see the Video: 49:00

Fuellmich is disseminating the facts about how completely worthless COVID-19 testing is to attorneys around the world free of charge. He’s aiming to encourage the filing of civil suits with the ultimate goal of exposing the whole sickening charade and, God willing, seeing that those responsible for this atrocity finally face justice.

Even if PCR tests actually did detect infection, however, there’d still be a huge problem.

The small false-positive rate that any test is bound to have means that mass testing for COVID-19 together with taking a single positive test as sufficient for diagnosis—AKA, what we’ve been doing all along—is bound to create a fake pandemic even in the absence of any real one.

Suppose, for the sake of example, the virus didn’t even exist. Testing 10 million people would still result in 100,000 false-positives even if the rate were just a piddling one percent.

So, no matter how you slice it, the policies we’ve been following at WHO director-general, Tedros and Anthony Fauci‘s behest were guaranteed to create a phony pandemic from now till the end of time—as both of them had to know all too well.

And, of course, if we return to the policies we’ve always followed in the past, as WHO now recommends, COVID-19 case and death numbers will start precipitously dropping just as Joe Biden takes office.

Nancy Pelosi Outlines The Democrats Scam to Win Elections

Just Amazing……..Straight From Her Own Mouth. Word for Word. In action daily for 4 years to prevent Trump (and many others) from being a candidate and then to ELIMINATE him when he became President.

  1. Pelosi Calls it “THE Wrap-up Smear”
  2. “SMEAR your opponent with falsehoods and all the rest”
  3. “Then Merchandise it”
  4. “And then, you (the press) write it up”,
  5. “Then THEY (the public) see it reported in the press, this and this and this”
  6. “And then they (the public) have this validation”
  7. And the media reports the lies over and over………….

Older Posts »