Food for DEEP Thought…        I found these numbers interesting. 
  As reported by the CDC … Here are the US deaths by year and the change from the previous year.  Year 2017:    2,818,503 Americans died   Year 2018:   2,839,205 deaths (20,702 more than the previous year 2017)   Year 2019:   2,855,000 deaths (16,300 more than the previous year 2018)   The year of the pandemic …   Year 2020:   2,913,144 deaths (57,641 more than the previous year 2019)   

BUT WAIT: There were zero deaths from Covid-19 during 2018, and 2019 and the jump from 2019 to 2020 was only 57,641

I’ve been told that COVID is responsible now for 400,000 + deaths. Shouldn’t the 2020 number be a hell of a lot higher?  So the question becomes: How many people died OF COVID and How many died (of other causes) WITH COVID?  Now read below:   

Food for thought:   A very well-orchestrated plan, or an unimaginable set of events that just fell into place with the United States front and center.  You tell me!!  Scare people with a virus, force them to wear masks and place them in quarantine.  Count the number of dead every second of every day, in every News Headline.  By the way, ninety-nine and eight-tenths of the people who get the virus, recover.  About one to two tenths of one percent who get the virus, die.  Most all of them have other medical problems.  Did you catch that?  Less than 1/2 of a percent die.   Close businesses = 35,000,000+ instantly unemployed.   Remove entertainment and prohibit recreation, Closing parks, gyms, bars, restaurants, sports.  No dating.  No touching.  Isolate people.  Dehumanize them.   Close Temples and Churches – prohibit worship.  Create a vacuum and let depression, anxiety, hopelessness, and desperation set in.  Then… ignite hatred and civil unrest, creating Civil War.   Empty the prisons because of the virus and fill the streets with criminals.   Send in Antifa and BLM to vandalize property, as if they are freedom fighters.   Undermine the law.  Riot, Loot and Attack all Law Enforcement, but tell government to order a stand-down.  Then… Defund Law Enforcement and abolish Police.  

Are We are all being played by those who want to destroy America!  This is how you destroy a Nation from within, and in very short order.  Will it work?  I guess that depends on you and me.   

Author Unknown:…… … but it needs to be shared.  I just did.  Your turn.

These irresponsible people in congress represent the People; Not Special Interests. Get rid of them. There is already $1 trillion appropriated for corona virus Stimulation (from Trump) waiting to be spent. This will cause massive inflation. The Left is bankrupting the Country.

I guess it is only in the private sector that things have to be
self- supporting.  Have we now passed the point of no return?

Now you will know why Republicans are blocking this 2.2
trillion-dollar congressional bill. Hard to believe but look it up on
the Congressional website for HR 748 from 116th Congress. Here’s the
direct link:

American population: 330,483,530
Stimulus bill: $2,000,000,000,000 ($2 Trillion)
Dividing the cost by every American is $6,051.74 The government could
have given every person over $6,000, but instead will give $1,200 to
each adult under a certain income. Want to know where the missing 96%
of your tax dollars went?  Here you go:

1.        $300,000,000 for Migrant and Refugee Assistance pg.. 147.

2.        $10,000 per person for student loan bailout.

3.        $100,000,000 to NASA, because, who knows why.

4.        $20,000,000,000 to the USPS, because why the hell not.

5.        $300,000,000 to the Endowment for the Arts - because of it.

6.        $300,000,000 for the Endowment for the Humanities/ because
no one even knew that was a thing.

7.        $15,000,000 for Veterans Employment Training / for when the
GI Bill isn't enough.

8.        $435,000,000 for mental health support.

9.        $30,000,000,000 for the Department of Education
stabilization fund/ because that will keep people employed (all those
zeros can be confusing, that’s $30 BILLION).

10.     $200,000,000 to Safe Schools Emergency Response to Violence Program.

11.     $300,000,000 to Public Broadcasting / NPR has to be bought by
the Democrats.

12.     $500,000,000 to Museums and Libraries / Who the hell knows how
we are going to use it.

13.     $720,000,000 to Social Security Admin / but get this only
200,000,000 is to help people. The rest is for admin costs.

14.     $25,000,000 for Cleaning supplies for the Capitol Building / I
kid you not it's on page 136.

15.     $7,500,000 to the Smithsonian for additional salaries.

16.     $35,000,000 to the JFK Center for Performing Arts.

17.     $25,000,000 for additional salary for House of Representatives.

18.     $3,000,000,000 upgrade to the IT department at the VA.

19.     $315,000,000 for State Department Diplomatic Programs.

20.     $95,000,000 for the Agency of International Development.

21.     $300,000,000 for International Disaster Assistance.

22.     $90,000,000 for the Peace Corp pg. 148.

23.     $13,000,000 to Howard University pg. 121.

24.     $9,000,000 Misc. Senate Expenses pg. 134.

25.     $100,000,000 to Essential Air carriers pg. 162. This of note
because the Airlines are going to need billions in loans to keep them
afloat  ($100,000,000 is chump change.)

26.     $40,000,000,000 goes to the Take Responsibility to Workers and
Families Act This sounds like it's direct payments for workers pg.

27.     $1,000,000,000 Airlines Recycle and Save Program pg. 163

28.     $25,000,000 to the FAA for administrative costs pg. 165

29.     $492,000,000 to National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) pg. 167

30.     $526,000,000 Grants to Amtrak to remain available if needed
through 2021 pg. 168 (what are the odds that doesn't go unused) Hidden
on page 174 the Secretary has 7 days to allocate the funds & notify

31.     $25,000,000,000 for Transit Infrastructure pg. 169

32.     $3,000,000 Maritime Administration pg. 172

33.     $5,000,000 Salaries and Expensive Office of the Inspector
General pg. 172

34.     $2,500,000 Public and Indian Housing pg. 175

35.     $5,000,000 Community Planning and Development pg. 175

36.  $2,500,000 Office of Housing

From OANN: February 20, 2021: 30:55

Former President Trump broke his radio silence and called into Fox News for his first interview since leaving office to pay tribute to Rush Limbaugh after his passing away from cancer was announced earlier today on his radio show by his wife.

Trump called “Outnumbered” on Wednesday to remember and honor one of the greatest and most beloved talk radio personalities America has ever known. The former president had spoken to Limbaugh there or four days ago and he noted that Limbaugh had been in bad shape for some time. “He, in theory, could have been gone four months ago, really,” Trump stated. “He was a fighter.”

Limbaugh was 70-years-old. He had been diagnosed with stage IV lung cancer in January of 2020. His wife Kathryn has been steadfastly at his side since the diagnosis and millions of Americans were praying for remission. But Limbaugh’s battle ended on Wednesday with his wife by his side. Trump noted how Limbaugh was always speaking fondly of his wife and noting how well she took care of him.

Trump went on to praise the radio legend further by saying that people “respected him even if they didn’t like him.” “He is a legend. He really is. There aren’t too many legends around. But he is a legend,” Trump proclaimed. “And those people who listen to him every day, it was like a religious experience for a lot of people.”

Video Credit: Fox News

Trump and Limbaugh became friends during the former president’s 2016 campaign. “He was a unique guy, and he became a friend of mine,” Trump proudly stated.

“I didn’t know Rush at all, I had barely met him,” he recalled. “Without ever having met him or talked to him or had lunch with him, he was right with me from the beginning.”

Trump gave credit where it was due, calling Limbaugh “something special” and noting that it was the renowned conservative who helped him emerge as the leader from the GOP primary. “Rush felt very early that we were going to win, before the escalator ride, if you wanna know the truth,” Trump reminisced.

Trump spoke briefly about the election and how Limbaugh firmly believed that he had won.

He also went on to speak about what a great golfer Limbaugh was. “He was a strong guy, physically very strong, he hit the ball a long way.”

Trump also spoke of Limbaugh and his work ethic: “Rush is irreplaceable, unique. He had an audience that was massive. … He would get up in the show and just talk. He wouldn’t take phone calls, where people would call in every two minutes. That’s sort of easy to do. He would just talk for two hours or three hours, just talk,” Trump said. “That’s not an easy thing to do. I once asked him, I said, ‘Do you study for the show?’ He said, ‘Actually, I study very hard,’ which a little bit surprised me. He was a fantastic man, a fantastic talent. People, whether they loved him or not, they respected him. They really did.”

Condolences and tributes poured in for Rush Limbaugh after the news broke.

Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton tweeted: “Rush Limbaugh was a giant. With his straightforward, simple articulation of conservatism, he inspired millions. He was one-of-a-kind and he will be missed.”

We’d like to report a murder’: Trump attorney Michael van der Veen just DECIMATES the media during CBS interview (watch)

Posted at 8:34 am on February 14, 2021 by Sam J.

It’s not often we can say, ‘this video speaks for itself’ but BOY HOWDY, this video of Trump attorney Michael van der Veen’s CBS interview does indeed speak for itself.

And very loudly and painfully.

Yup, he nailed the media.

She did what they always do with anything Trump or conservative-related. That sideways, smug, condescending tone where they think they’re the smartest one in the room and in this case she definitely was not.

It really feels like MVDV speaks for most of us with his obvious disgust and disdain not only for her behavior but the media in general.

February 11, 2021  Constitutional NobodyPolitics

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis on Wednesday did not mince words on a congested conference call with Biden and federal health authorities who are seeking to prohibit domestic travel to and from the Sunshine State. DeSantis and Biden exchanged salvos of biting barbs after the criminal president said the federal government had authority to “restrict movement” of the people.

Citing concerns over the widespread proliferation of Covid-19 variants, Biden said he might have to prohibit vehicle and air traffic until the CDC and NIH were confident that currently available vaccinations had a proven efficacy against emerging strains, such as highly transmissible anomalies from the United Kingdom, Brazil, and South Africa.

Also on the call were “Deep State” Dr. Fauci and acting CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, both of whom championed Biden’s idea and told DeSantis that surging cases in Florida threatened to undermine the federal government’s expansive efforts to mitigate spread across the country. Florida, Dr. Fauci said, was the epicenter of Covid-19 mutations, and argued that new variants accounted for between 15-35% of new cases in Florida.

Walensky argued on the call that any attempt by DeSantis to resist a federally mandated travel ban would be immoral, selfish, and possibly illegal.

Biden echoed her words, and he berated DeSantis for having left Florida’s economy open during “the dark days of Covid.” Moreover, Biden claimed he had unilateral and constitutional authority to protect the nation’s health from “rogue politicians” acting in contravention of established health guidelines.

DeSantis’s initial reply was brief and blunt: “I will not comply,” he said, and then cited the CDC’s own statistics showing a nationwide decline in active Covid-19 cases.

Florida had arrested the spread of Covid-19, DeSantis argued, and accused Biden of targeting Republican states that supported Donald Trump.

“Florida absolutely will not comply,” DeSantis repeated. “Instituting a travel ban or restriction of movement would be a gross example of federal overreach with no grounding in law or science. We have Covid-19 in check, and you’re trying to exert unlawful authority over our state and its people,” he chided Biden.

Biden then tacitly threatened to withhold federal funding and to deny Florida access to Covid-19 vaccinations.

“C’mon, man, Florida needs our help, and you need vaccines, which are hard to come by, isn’t that right, Dr. Fauci,” Biden said.

The “Deep State” doctor replied in the affirmative, telling DeSantis that he expects the prevalence of the UK variant to double or triple every week to 10 days.

“Governor, do you want to be responsible for reinfecting the nation? Truth is, we don’t even know how effective current vaccines are against the UK strain.”

DeSantis told Dr. Fauci he trusted his own state health authorities over financially incentivized federal officials.

“How much do you stand to earn from these vaccines, Dr. Fauci? And, Joe, if you continue with this course of action, I will authorize the state National Guard to protect the movement of Floridians,” DeSantis said.

“Address me as Mr. President or President Biden,” Biden said.

“I will not, and you can go fuck yourself,” DeSantis said before hanging up.

In closing, it seems obvious that Team Biden favors perpetual lockdowns and a stagnant economy, keeping Americans imprisoned under a de facto state of medical martial law.

The post Gov. DeSantis Tells Biden: “Go Fuck Yourself” appeared first on Real Raw News.

Pretty Much Irrefutable Proof. If this happened in NH, with Dominion Voting machines, a Republican Stronghold, what are the odds it also happened in the toss-up states: Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Arizona, Texas, Georgia, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and North Carolina. I would say 100% Probability.

We need a nation wide investigation to insure election integrity in the 2020 and future elections.

(Republican Insider) – There have been some rather significant updates to the current battle going on in different key battleground states concerning the possibility of voter fraud that took place during the 2020 election and resulted in former President Donald Trump being cheated out of a second term in the White House. 

According to Gateway Pundit, there is some new information to go along with a report they published on their website on Wednesday of this week concerning voter fraud in the state of New Hampshire. They previously reported that a recent hand recount revealed that every GOP candidate in Windham, New Hampshire was shorted by 300 votes by Dominion-owned voting machines. 

The folks over at GP then spoke with Dr. David Strang M.D., who is the Belknap County Republican Committee State Committee Member for the New Hampshire Republican Party.

David said that the GOP candidates in Windham had a total of 6 percent of their overall votes removed by the Dominion machines. Strang also said that these same Dominion-owned machines are used in around 85 percent of the towns in the state. 

This makes the results of the 2020 election all the more suspect in New Hampshire, especially when you take into consideration the fact that Republicans actually turned the state red in their Senate for a total of 14 seats to 10 in 2020.

The GOP also flipped the House red by taking 213-187 majority. And yet, somehow, despite Republicans winning such huge victories in New Hampshire, Joe Biden, who was 4th in the overall primary, managed to beat former President Trump 52.7 to 45.4?

Something about that seems suspect, don’t you think? Well, if Strang is right, then Democrats managed to skim 6 percent of the vote off the top of every Republican candidate in races where there was a recount, thus enabling Biden to take a victory that he did not earn. If this happened in New Hampshire, it likely happened elsewhere. 

All we really want is to have these incidents and claims investigated and evaluated. That does not seem that unreasonable, right? We just want to protect the integrity of our election system to ensure every vote and very voice counts. 

As of right now, NH Attorney General Anne Edwards, who is a Republican, has not indicated that there will be an investigation into claims of voter fraud. It’s up to the folks of New Hampshire to put pressure on the attorney general by calling her office and demanding she launch an investigation into this matter. 

BLM is an Avowed Communist Organization

You Can’t Make this stuff up.



A One World Communist Government (controlled by the elite) Versus Individual Freedom

TIME Mag: “Trump Was Right. There Was A Conspiracy… Well-Funded Cabal, Powerful People Changing Laws, Steering Media & Controlling Information.”

Time Magazine has published intricate details of what they deem “a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs. Both surprises were the result of an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans.”

The article even confirms both The National Pulse’s reporting on former Obama lawyer Ian Bassin, as well as’s assertion of the involvement of Norm Eisen in what amounted to a major admission of a globalist set up to leverage the coronavirus, mail-in voting, and corporate interest to oust President Trump from office.

In a 6500-word article, author Molly Ball lays out how it all happened:

The handshake between business and labor was just one component of a vast, cross-partisan campaign to protect the election–an extraordinary shadow effort… Their work touched every aspect of the election. They got states to change voting systems and laws and helped secure hundreds of millions in public and private funding.

Time Magazine is scarcely a right-wing website, and the article goes to lengths to make excuses on behalf of the “shadow” campaign, they claim: “The scenario the shadow campaigners were desperate to stop was not a Trump victory. It was an election so calamitous that no result could be discerned at all…”

But the piece concedes “much of this activity took place on the left.”

Time alleges campaigners “successfully pressured social media companies to take a harder line against disinformation and used data-driven strategies to fight viral smears.”

By the eighth paragraph, Ball quotes Norm Eisen, who in early September 2020 the website described as the “Legal hatchet man and central operative in the “color revolution” against President Trump.”

By the eleventh, they note the efforts of Ian Bassin, who The National Pulse exclusively reported on – also in September.

Ball writes that “participants” like Eisen and Bassin now “want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.”

Ball identifies Mike Podhorzer, political director at AFL-CIO, as “the architect” of the conspiracy.

Changing American Elections Forever.

“The first task was overhauling America’s balky election infrastructure,” Time states, with particular focus on what Phil Kline and the Amistad Project had brought to the attention of the world with the assistance of The National Pulse in October.

They admit: An assortment of foundations contributed tens of millions in election-administration funding. The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative chipped in $300 million.

The story directly echoes The National Pulse reporting from October 6th, though doesn’t credit the article which stated at the time: “The group recently received $250 million from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, and the significant majority of the sum has been funneled into Democratic districts.”

Using George Floyd.

The death of George Floyd was also cynically leveraged for political ends, the article claims: The racial-justice uprising sparked by George Floyd’s killing in May was not primarily a political movement. The organizers who helped lead it wanted to harness its momentum for the election without allowing it to be co-opted by politicians. Many of those organizers were part of Podhorzer’s network, from the activists in battleground states who partnered with the Democracy Defense Coalition to organizations with leading roles in the Movement for Black Lives.

And the claim is even made that campaigners should be used for their votes and those they could bring with them in their communities, but not to let them anywhere near the levers of power aka politicians.

Big Business.

Then, America’s big corporates stepped in: While the AFL-CIO and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce pretend to be at each other’s throats, they reality is much of the back and forth is kabuki theater. The article confirms as much:

Neil Bradley, the Chamber’s executive vice president and chief policy officer… wanted to send a broader, more bipartisan message. He reached out to Podhorzer, through an intermediary both men declined to name. Agreeing that their unlikely alliance would be powerful, they began to discuss a joint statement pledging their organizations’ shared commitment to a fair and peaceful election.

The stage was set for the conspiracy to be carried out: In effect, big business, big activist groups, big unions, and big media would collaborate to keep President Trump away from office and keep reporting on the steal off the airwaves and social media.

And while the article continues to claim the activists were not trying to stop Trump winning but rather guarantee a fair election, one line gives the whole thing away.

Ball reveals an 11pm Zoom call on election night wherein – when President Trump was in the lead – Podhorzer stepped in to calm his colleagues down:

“Podhorzer presented data to show the group that victory was in hand.”

And he told Time something very true: “I don’t think the Trump campaign had a backup plan.”

The article even claims that grassroots conservative activists came close to rumbling the plan, especially in Michigan, where observers were locked out of the counting room and placards placed on windows to stop them seeing inside.

Claiming Credit.

The rationale for the article is simple, and even contained within the piece:

As I was reporting this article in November and December, I heard different claims about who should get the credit for thwarting Trump’s plot.

Liberals argued the role of bottom-up people power shouldn’t be overlooked, particularly the contributions of people of color and local grassroots activists.

Others stressed the heroism of GOP officials like Van Langevelde and Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffensperger, who stood up to Trump at considerable cost. The truth is that neither likely could have succeeded without the other.

In other words, now the constituent parts are trying to claim credit, and along they way, they’ve said the quiet part out loud.

Frontline Doctors: Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer’ than COVID-19

Physicians’ white paper says injection prohibited for the young and at least discouraged for healthy individuals under 70 years of age. ‘Unethical’ to advocate vaccine for persons under 50.

January 29, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — In an extraordinary recent presentation exposing “the serious and life-threatening disinformation campaign” being waged against the American people and the world, Dr. Simone Gold of the American Frontline Doctors (AFLD) laid out the facts on the Wuhan Virus, safe highly-effective treatments, and particularly what she calls “experimental biological agents,” otherwise referred to as the COVID-19 vaccines.  

Dr. Gold referred listeners to two AFLD websites where they can access a white paper produced by the AFLD physicians that provides thorough explanations and references for her presentation. Gold concluded her presentation with a passionate appeal for everyone to sign and spread a petition against authoritarian movements aimed at coercing individuals into receiving these injections.

The group’s white paper brings an array of crucial information together and is clear, accessible and well-documented. It reflects not only a depth of competence and great facility on the topics but a resolute commitment to truth and a deep fidelity to the noble mission of providing sound medical care for patients while defending the common good at large.

Highlights of the paper and Dr. Gold’s presentation include the following:

Correct language is ‘critical’: Not COVID-19 ‘vaccines,’ but experimental biological agents

Dr. Gold insists that even the designation of the new products as vaccines is inapprorpriate.

“Definitely you should not be calling this the ‘COVID-19 vaccines,’” she says. “The reason is, whatever you call it, it’s experimental. It’s not been approved as a vaccine. It’s currently in its investigational stage.”

The initial FAQ of the white paper explains, “According to the Food and Drug Administration, ‘An investigational drug can also be called an experimental drug and is being studied to see if your disease or medical condition improves while taking it.’  Pfizer and Moderna and AstraZeneca applications properly identify their new agents as ‘investigational,’ which is normal at this very early stage of development.”SUBSCRIBEto LifeSite’s daily headlinesSUBSCRIBEU.S. Canada World Catholic

The paper goes on to confirm that this experimental status means that “adverse events will be settled under the legal standard for experimental medications.”

As part of this experimental status, Dr. Gold explained, “If you take the vaccine, you’re being enrolled in a pharmocol vigilance tracking system. It means you have enrolled yourself in a medical trial … most people are not aware that that’s what they’re doing. This pharmocol vigilance tracking system tracks you for (at least) two years, it’s set up by the Department of Defense, it was handed off to Oracle and Google to put the data together. How is it that people want to sign up for this system on an experimental (biological agent)?” she asked.

Thus, the founder of AFLD affirmed these injected treatments are “most properly called experimental biological agents. … We need to call this by its proper name. Never talk about this without the word ‘experimental.’  That’s critical,” she said.

‘Wuhan Virus’ to ‘COVID-19’

In the presentation, Dr. Gold called the massive “disinformation campaign” on these topics “a crime against humanity” and stated, “You must understand the magnitude of the lie in order to understand what they are trying to tell you about these experimental vaccines.”

As the paper observed, “from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic,” there has been “massive disinformation” beginning with its very name.  

Initially, and naturally, the pandemic was referred to as the “Wuhan Virus” since “epidemics have historically been named for the location from where they arise or are associated. Consider: Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, Spanish Flu, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, Lyme Disease,” they wrote.

But this name was massively “rebranded” to “COVID-19” due to the displeasure of the Chinese Communist Party with the original name.— Article continues below Petition —PETITION: No to mandatory vaccination for the coronavirus 

Greatest disinformation: Hydroxychloroquine

The paper documented in some depth the “(m)ost notable” disinformation regarding the pandemic, which “was selling the lie to the American and European people that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an unsafe medication.” They detailed how the lie was advanced by “Scientists,” the “Media & The Elite,” “Big Tech Censorship,” and with “Government Punishment of Doctors.”

As HCQ is “considered one of the safest medications in the world, safer than Motrin or Tylenol,” it has been broadly used outside the west with great success. For example, in response to the virus, both China and India mandated or recommended HCQ for its population early last year, and at least India, “continues to enjoy a death rate a fraction (~10 percent) of the USA even in the most densely populated slums.”

“So in America the death rates are in the 800 range per million,” Dr. Gold explained. “In Africa, Sub-Sahara Africa, the poorest places in the world, no social distancing, no mask, no ICU’s, they have a death rate of one percent the western nations. One percent!”

“Now I believe it is due to widely available HCQ. I don’t think you can explain it for any other reason,” she said.

The paper provided thorough documentation on  how “(c)ountries where HCQ is widely available, which are typically third world countries that have malaria or citizens who travel to malaria-endemic regions, have 1-10 percent of the death rates of first world nations where HCQ is severely restricted.”

Extremely high survival rate / low infection fatality rate for Wuhan Virus

“The most enduring myth regarding COVID-19,” the doctors wrote, “is that this is a highly lethal infection. It is not. The data is unequivocal:

  • COVID-19 kills very rarely and is mostly limited to the medically fragile,
  • COVID-19 is less deadly than influenza in children,
  • COVID-19 is similar lethality in the middle adult years and treatable.”

They went on to cite the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) own “best estimate” to demonstrate that the infection fatality rate (IFR) is overall very low: 

  • 0-19 years old: 0.00003 (99.997 percent survival rate)
  • 20-49 years old: 0.0002 (99.98 percent survival rate)
  • 50-69 years old: 0.005 (99.5 percent survival rate)
  • 70+ years old: 0.054 (94.6 percent survival rate)

Further, in the presentation, Dr. Gold emphasized that these very high survival rates reflect cases where people have not received treatment with HCQ, or another “miracle” drug, ivermectin, and thus with such simple, inexpensive treatments, they would be much higher still. Gold referenced the testimony of doctors before a U.S. Senate committee in November who said if such treatments had been available, very high numbers of lives could have been saved.

In the paper, the doctors observed, “It is quite clear that young people are at a statistically insignificant risk of death from COVID-19,” and for most people under 65, “the risk of dying from COVID-19 isn’t much higher than from getting in a car accident driving to work.”

Safety concerns for experimental vaccines

In contrast to the utilization of safe treatments like HCQ and ivermectin, there are many significant safety concerns with these experimental vaccines.  

Brand new mRNA technology

First, what the doctors call the “largest experimental medication program in our history” uses a brand-new technology utilizing messenger RNA.  “No vaccine” based on this technology “has ever been approved for any disease, or even entered final-stage trials until now, so there’s no peer-reviewed published human data to compare how mRNA stacks up against older technologies,” AFLD said.

No independently published animal studies

Further, previous coronavirus vaccines developed over decades have consistently failed in animal trials with the death of their subjects. Yet, these experimental vaccines have no independently published animal studies.

“Vaccine safety requires proper animal trials and peer-reviewed data,” the paper stated, “neither of which has occurred” with these experimental biological agents.

Recipient may become more vulnerable to virus

The AFLD White Paper stated that one of the greatest safety concerns relates to how “(p)rior coronavirus (and other respiratory) vaccines have failed due to the scientific phenomena known as pathogenic priming that makes the vaccine recipient more likely to suffer a sudden fatal outcome due to massive cytokine storm when exposed to the wild virus.”

Of note, current reports revealed that hundreds of individuals injected with COVID-19 experimental vaccines have been admitted to the hospital, and the shots have so far been linked to at least 181 deaths in the United States.

Neurological diseases, long-term effects

The paper listed many other possible complications, including neurological diseases, and cited from the “extremely limited COVID-19 vaccine data” instances of them already occurring.  

There is also no data on sub-categories of the population, including the elderly, women who desire to get pregnant, those who have had the Wuhan Virus already, and since these experimental agents are brand new, “we cannot know any long-term effects.”


In addition, these chemicals may impact a woman’s fertility. The paper explained that the “mechanism of action of the experimental mRNA vaccines includes a possible auto-immune rejection of the placenta. In layman’s terms, the vaccine may permanently interfere with a woman’s ability to maintain a pregnancy.”

“The vaccine companies themselves acknowledge the possibility of ill effects on a pregnancy on the vaccine bottle, which says the following: ‘it is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA VaccineBNT162b2 has an impact on fertility,’” the doctors wrote.

Dr. Gold emphasized, “I would never let a woman of child-bearing age take this.  I would fight tooth and nail (to prevent it), under no circumstances, until this placenta question is answered.”

Manufactures have no liability

Of great concern as well is the fact that the companies that produce these experimental biological agents “are immune from all liability” due to the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Therefore, those who are injured or even the families of those who suffer death due to these injections will have no claim on the manufacturers themselves. 

Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer’ than the Wuhan Virus

AFLD then drew from common sense to conclude that taking an experimental vaccine “is not safer” than a very low IFR for the Wuhan Virus. Besides the “extraordinarily low” mortality rates, doctors are “getting better and better at treating COVID-19: the death rate in terms of population continues to fall, hospital stays for COVID-19 get shorter and hospital mortality from COVID-19 plummets.”

While not directly asserting that the experimental vaccines are unsafe, AFLD clarified that “We are saying that by definition it is unsafe to widely distribute an experimental vaccine, because taking a vaccine is completely different than taking an ordinary medication.”

“In contrast to taking a medication for an actual disease,” they explained, “the person who takes a vaccine is typically completely healthy and would continue to be healthy without the vaccine. As the first rule of the Hippocratic Oath is: do no harm, vaccine safety must be guaranteed. That has not yet happened.”

No proof that the experimental vaccines stop transmission of the virus

The doctors highlighted that there is no data on whether or not these experimental agents are actually capable of stopping the transmission of the virus. They affirmed that the “scientists are very upfront about the fact that they don’t know if the vaccine even stops the spread of the virus!”

They cited a Medscape article that quotes a former FDA official who said, “(w)e don’t know if people can become infected and thus also transmit even with vaccination.” For this reason, “people can expect to still be wearing masks, still be asked to follow non-pharmaceutical public health measures that we’ve all come to know so well.”

In dismay, Dr. Gold explained this point in her presentation, saying, “What is super shocking is that there is no proof that this biological agent actually stops the transmission among people.  It’s like a joke, this is like the punch line to a joke, ‘let’s take a vaccine, and by the way it doesn’t actually stop transmission.’ I mean, I don’t even know what to say to that!”

AFLD recommendations regarding COVID-19 experimental vaccines

Based on the IFR by age, along with real potential dangers, AFLD came up with recommendations for who should not submit themselves to these experimental biological agents and who may have an option to.

In summary, they stated, that such injections are “Prohibited for the young, Discouraged for the healthy middle-aged and Optional for the co-morbid and elderly.”

Dr. Gold commented, “If you are under age 20, the experimental vaccine is prohibited, in our opinion, absolutely prohibited. We simply don’t know enough about its effects on fertility, and we do know that this virus, essentially does not affect young people. Essentially,” with regards to young people, COVID-19 is “irrelevant!”

“From age 20 to 50, if you are healthy, we strongly discourage,” your receiving this experimental agent, she said. “There is an exceedingly low risk,” as well.

In their white paper, the AFLD summarized their advice to different sections of the population regarding the vaccines.

a. 0-20: prohibited(exceedingly low risk from COVID, unknown risk of auto-immune disease, unknown risk of pathogenic priming, risk of lifelong infertility) 

b. 20-50 healthy: strongly discouraged (exceedingly low risk from COVID, unknown risk of auto-immune disease, unknown risk of pathogenic priming, risk of lifelong infertility) 

c. 50-69 & healthy: strongly discouraged (low risk from COVID, unknown risk of auto-immune disease, unknown risk of pathogenic priming, unknown effect on placenta and spermatogenesis)

d. 50-69 & co-morbid: discouraged (experimental vaccine is higher risk than early or prophylactic treatment with established medications) 

e. >70 & healthy: personal risk assessment (experimental vaccine is higher risk than early or prophylactic treatment with established medications) 

f. >70 & co-morbid: personal risk assessment & advocacy access (experimental vaccine early or prophylactic treatment with established medications) 

The doctors concluded, “In medicine, the guiding principle is ‘First, do no harm.’ Widely distributing a COVID-19 experimental vaccine before adequately addressing and clinically evaluating the above concerns is reckless.”

Indeed, they charge that it is, in fact, “unethical to advocate for the vaccine to persons under 50. The risk and safety evidence based upon trials cannot be justified in younger persons. It is therefore prohibited.”

They also promised to do everything they can to assist injured plaintiffs who sue pharmaceutical companies, private businesses or government agencies who mandate or coerce “persons to comply with unethical policies for which there is substantial evidence of likely harm.”

Call to action: Sign and spread the petition

In response to projected vaccine mandates, Dr. Gold announced, “We intend to fight the urge that’s sweeping the globe to mandate people taking an experimental biological agent.”  

AFLD is not primarily concerned with the government, but with private businesses mandating these injections, particularly schools and airlines.

“We intend to talk to the decision-makers in the airline industry,” she said. “One of our tools in that battle will be to go in armed with at least, at least, one million signatures of human beings who are going to say ‘no, we are not going to do business with anybody, and we are not going to fly with anyone who is going to mandate (experimental vaccines).’”

She encouraged everyone to “go to and sign the petition. You also must share that petition with everyone. Do not be shy! … it is your obligation. I’ve done my part, my doctors have done their part, you must do your part.”

“Not only do you sign it, (but) each of you should take it on yourself to say, ‘I’m going to make sure I get a thousand signatures’,” she said.

Gold also encouraged those who are in a union to build advocacy against these injections within their union.

And finally, she reminded her audience, “ALWAYS use the word ‘EXPERIMENTAL’ when you talk about this. Always!”

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page.  View it here.


YouTube bans Frontline Doctors speech criticizing ‘experimental agent’ COVID vaccine 

Physicians: ‘Masks don’t control viruses, they control you,’ ‘pandemic is over’

Former Pfizer VP: ‘No need for vaccines,’ ‘the pandemic is effectively over’

US ‘frontline’ doctors’ website exposes ‘criminal’ campaign by tech giants, govt agencies to block COVID med

Why are Google, Facebook, Twitter so bent on censoring doctors who promote cure for COVID?

January 24, 2021: 30:

Dr. Fauci has been with (NIH), The National Institute of Health since 1965.

For the Complete Corona Virus Story Listen from 00:00 to 20:22

Posted by: bj | January 24, 2021

No More Bohemian Grove?

The Werff Report and FBI Confirms these reports:

Here is the Proof!

Posted by: bj | January 23, 2021

Lin Wood: Is on and Records a Zoom Call

January 23, 2021: On Rumble: FBI, CIA, NSA, DOJ will not tell us all the facts, maybe this is the beginning.

As ace trial attorney, Reiner Fuellmich says in his powerful video presentation, COVID is a Crime Against Humanity, the only pandemic we’ve ever suffered is a phony PCR-testing pandemic. Read Details Below the link and then Click on link below to see the Video: 49:00

Fuellmich is disseminating the facts about how completely worthless COVID-19 testing is to attorneys around the world free of charge. He’s aiming to encourage the filing of civil suits with the ultimate goal of exposing the whole sickening charade and, God willing, seeing that those responsible for this atrocity finally face justice.

Even if PCR tests actually did detect infection, however, there’d still be a huge problem.

The small false-positive rate that any test is bound to have means that mass testing for COVID-19 together with taking a single positive test as sufficient for diagnosis—AKA, what we’ve been doing all along—is bound to create a fake pandemic even in the absence of any real one.

Suppose, for the sake of example, the virus didn’t even exist. Testing 10 million people would still result in 100,000 false-positives even if the rate were just a piddling one percent.

So, no matter how you slice it, the policies we’ve been following at WHO director-general, Tedros and Anthony Fauci‘s behest were guaranteed to create a phony pandemic from now till the end of time—as both of them had to know all too well.

And, of course, if we return to the policies we’ve always followed in the past, as WHO now recommends, COVID-19 case and death numbers will start precipitously dropping just as Joe Biden takes office.

This will result in fewer people testing positive for Covid 19 and fewer deaths from Covid 19 – and more deaths from the regular flu most likely.

This all is obviously being done to make Biden look better than Trump.

Posted by: bj | January 20, 2021



Posted by: bj | January 20, 2021

The Original Sports Drink (when I was a kid)

Posted by: bj | January 20, 2021

Joe Biden: Not My President –

by Newt Gingrich: January 2021 (my sentiments exactly!)

This grows out of a level of outrage unlike anything previously experienced.

A smart friend of mine who is a moderate liberal asked why I was not recognizing Joe Biden’s victory. The friend made the case that Mr. Biden had gotten more votes, and historically we recognize the person with the most votes. Normally, we accept the outcome of elections just as we accept the outcomes of sporting events. So, my friend asked why was 2020 different?

Having spent more than four years watching the left Resist President Donald Trump and focus entirely on undoing and undermining the 2016 election, it took me several days to understand the depth of my own feelings. As I thought about it, I realized my anger and fear were not narrowly focused on votes. My unwillingness to relax and accept that the election grew out of a level of outrage and alienation unlike anything I had experienced in more than 60 years involvement in public affairs.

The challenge is that I — and other conservatives — are not disagreeing with the left within a commonly understood world. We live in alternative worlds. The left’s world is mostly the established world of the forces who have been dominant for most of my life. My world is the populist rebellion which believes we are being destroyed, our liberties are being cancelled and our religions are under assault. (Note the new Human Rights Campaign to decertify any religious school which does not accept secular sexual values — and that many Democrat governors have kept casinos open while closing churches though the COVID-19 pandemic.) We also believe other Democrat-led COVID-19 policies have enriched the wealthy while crushing middle class small business owners (some 160,000 restaurants may close).

In this context, let’s talk first about the recent past and the presidency. In 2016, I supported an outsider candidate, who was rough around the edges and in the Andrew Jackson school of controversial assaults on the old order. When my candidate won, it was blamed on the Russians.

We now know (four years later) Hillary Clinton’s own team financed the total lie that fueled this attack.

Members of the FBI twice engaged in criminal acts to help it along— once in avoiding prosecution of someone who had deleted 33,000 emails and had a subordinate use a hammer to physically destroy hard drives, and a second time by lying to FISA judges to destroy Gen. Michael Flynn and spy on then-candidate Donald Trump and his team.

The national liberal media aided and abetted every step of the way. All this was purely an attempt to cripple the new president and lead to the appointment of a special counsel — who ultimately produced nothing.

Now, people in my world are told it is time to stop resisting and cooperate with the new president. But we remember that the Democrats wanted to cooperate with Mr. Trump so much that they began talking about his impeachment before he even took office. The Washington Post ran a story on Democrat impeachment plots the day of the inauguration. In fact, nearly 70 Democratic lawmakers boycotted his inauguration. A massive left-wing demonstration was staged in Washington the day after, where Madonna announced she dreamed of blowing up the White House to widespread applause.

These same forces want me to cooperate with their new president. I find myself adopting the Nancy Pelosi model of constant resistance. Nothing I have seen from Mr. Biden since the election offers me any hope that he will reach out to the more than 74 million Americans who voted for President Trump.

So, I am not reacting to the votes so much as to the whole election environment. When Twitter and Facebook censored the oldest and fourth largest newspaper (founded by Alexander Hamilton) because it accurately reported news that could hurt Mr. Biden’s chances — where were The New York Times and The Washington Post?

The truth of the Hunter Biden story is now becoming impossible to avoid or conceal. The family of the Democrat nominee for president received at least $5 million from an entity controlled by our greatest adversary. It was a blatant payoff, and most Americans who voted for Mr. Biden never heard of it — or were told before the election it was Russian disinformation. Once they did hear of it, 17% said they would have switched their votes, according to a poll by the Media Research Center. That’s the entire election. The censorship worked exactly as intended.

Typically, newspapers and media outlets band together when press freedom is threatened by censorship. Where was the sanctimonious “democracy dies in darkness?” Tragically, The Washington Post is now part of the darkness. But this is just a start.

When Twitter censors four of five Rush Limbaugh tweets in one day, I fear for the country. When these monolithic Internet giants censor the president of the United States, I fear for the country. When I see elite billionaires like Mark Zuckerburg are able to spend $400 million to hire city governments to maximize turnout in specifically Democratic districts — without any regard to election spending laws or good governance standards — I fear for the country. When I read that Apple has a firm rule of never irritating China — and I watch the NBA kowtow to Beijing, I fear for our country. When I watch story after story about election fraud being spiked — without even the appearance of journalistic due diligence or curiosity — I know something is sick.

The election process itself was the final straw in creating the crisis of confidence which is accelerating and deepening for many millions of Americans. Aside from a constant stream of allegations of outright fraud, there are some specific outrages — any one of which was likely enough to swing the entire election.
Officials in virtually every swing state broke their states’ own laws to send out millions of ballots or ballot applications to every registered voter. It was all clearly documented in the Texas lawsuit, which was declined by the U.S. Supreme Court based on Texas’ procedural standing — not the merits of the case. That’s the election.

In addition, it’s clear that virtually every swing state essentially suspended normal requirements for verifying absentee ballots. Rejection rates were an order of magnitude lower than in a normal year. In Georgia, rejection rates dropped from 6.5% in 2016 to 0.2% in 2020.In Pennsylvania, it went from 1% in 2016 to .003% in 2020.Nevada fell from 1.6% to .75%. There is no plausible explanation other than that they were counting a huge number of ballots — disproportionately for Mr. Biden — that normally would not have passed muster. That’s the election.

The entire elite liberal media lied about the timeline of the COVID-19 vaccine. They blamed President Trump for the global pandemic even as he did literally everything top scientists instructed. In multiple debates, the moderators outright stated that he was lying about the U.S. having a vaccine before the end of the year (note Vice President Mike Pence received it this week). If Americans had known the pandemic was almost over, that too was likely the difference in the election.

The unanimously never-Trump debate commission spiked the second debate at a critical time in order to hurt President Trump. If there had been one more debate like the final one, it likely would have been pivotal.

This is just the beginning. But any one of those things alone is enough for Trump supporters to think we have been robbed by a ruthless establishment — which is likely to only get more corrupt and aggressive if it gets away with these blatant acts.

For more than four years, the entire establishment mobilized against the elected president of the United States as though they were an immune system trying to kill a virus. Now, they are telling us we are undermining democracy. You have more than 74 million voters who supported President Trump despite everything — and given the election mess, the number could easily be significantly higher. The truth is tens of millions of Americans are deeply alienated and angry. If Mr. Biden governs from the left — and he will almost certainly be forced to — that number will grow rapidly, and we will win a massive election in 2022.

Given this environment, I have no interest in legitimizing the father of a son who Chinese Communist Party members boast about buying. Nor do I have any interest in pretending that the current result is legitimate or honorable. It is simply the final stroke of a four-year establishment-media power grab. It has been perpetrated by people who have broken the law, cheated the country of information, and smeared those of us who believe in America over China, history over revisionism, and the liberal ideal of free expression over cancel culture. I write this in genuine sorrow, because I think we are headed toward a serious, bitter struggle in America. This extraordinary, coordinated four-year power grab threatens the fabric of our country and the freedom of every American.

Posted by: bj | January 17, 2021

Facinating Dubai

Posted by: bj | January 16, 2021

“My Cancer Story Rocks”

January 16, 2021

Posted by: bj | January 15, 2021

Mark Levin Shreds House Impeachment Report

By Pamela Geller – on January 14, 2021

Trump to Take Massive Action; Pardons, Declassifying and Special Counsels Allegedly Incoming

January 14, 2021

Posted by: bj | January 13, 2021

Lt. General Thomas McInerney: Jan. 9, 2021


Sunday: January 10, 2021: From

Posted by: bj | January 8, 2021

Simon Parkes – Update on Election Fraud

Jan 7, 2021

Jan. 7, 2021: 9:56 A Must Listen Video

For our Friends who are not up to speed on the FACTS!

Jan 5, 2021: The Sean Hannity Show: 9:46

Posted by: bj | January 4, 2021

Lin Wood Interview: Jan. 4, 2021


Nancy Pelosi Outlines The Democrats Scam to Win Elections

Just Amazing……..Straight From Her Own Mouth. Word for Word. In action daily for 4 years to prevent Trump (and many others) from being a candidate and then to ELIMINATE him when he became President.

  1. Pelosi Calls it “THE Wrap-up Smear”
  2. “SMEAR your opponent with falsehoods and all the rest”
  3. “Then Merchandise it”
  4. “And then, you (the press) write it up”,
  5. “Then THEY (the public) see it reported in the press, this and this and this”
  6. “And then they (the public) have this validation”
  7. And the media reports the lies over and over………….
Posted by: bj | September 23, 2018

My Cancer Story – This is an Amazing Story –

My Cancer Story – This is an Amazing Story – by: Joe Tippens Edmond, Oklahoma

Attitude, Positive Thinking & Humor

Hopefully this Story can help you or someone you know, or even may not know.


Older Posts »