Posted by: bj | September 6, 2010

Danish Generosity Versus Muslim Greed – 2010 – Is America Following Denmark’s Former Immigration Policies?

 Susan MacAllen is a contributing editor for  ( Salute the Danish Flag – it’s a Symbol of   Western Freedom By Susan MacAllen 

In 1978-9 I was living and studying in Denmark  . But in 1978 – even in    Copenhagen, one didn’t see Muslim immigrants. 

The Danish population embraced visitors, celebrated the exotic, went  out of its way to protect each of its citizens. It was proud of its new  brand of socialist liberalism one in development since the conservatives had  lost power in 1929 – a system where no worker had to struggle to survive,  where one ultimately could count upon the state as in, perhaps, no other  western nation at the time. 
The rest of  Europe  saw the Scandinavians as free-thinking, progressive  and infinitely generous in their welfare policies. Denmark boasted low crime  rates, devotion to the environment, a superior educational system and a history of humanitarianism. 
Denmark was also most generous in its immigration policies – it 
offered the best welcome in Europe to the new immigrant: generous welfare  payments from first arrival plus additional perks in transportation, housing  and education. It was determined to set a world example for inclusiveness  and multiculturalism.   How could it have predicted that one day in 2005 a series of political cartoons in a  newspaper would spark violence that would leave dozens dead in  the streets -all because its commitment to multiculturalism would come back  to bite? 
By the 1990’s the growing urban Muslim population was obvious – and   its unwillingness to integrate into Danish society was obvious.  Years of immigrants had settled into Muslim-exclusive enclaves.

 As the  Muslim leadership became more vocal about what they considered the decadence  of  Denmark’s liberal way of life, the Danes – once so welcoming – began to feel slighted. Many Danes had begun to see Islam as incompatible with their  long-standing values: belief in personal liberty and free speech, in 
equality for women, in tolerance for other ethnic groups, and a deep pride  in Danish heritage and history. 

An article by Daniel Pipes and Lars  Hedegaard, in which they forecasted, accurately, that the growing immigrant 
problem in Denmark would explode. In the article they reported: 
‘Muslim immigrants constitute 5 percent of the population but consume  upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending.’ 

 Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmark’s 5..4 million people but make  up a majority of the country’s convicted rapists, an especially  combustible issue given that practically all the female victims are 
non-Muslim. Similar, if lesser, disproportions are found in other crimes.’ 
‘Over time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish less  to mix with the indigenous population. A recent survey finds that only 5 percent of young Muslimimmigrants   would readily marry a Dane.’ 

‘Forced marriages – promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male  cousin in the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes on  pain of death – are one problem’ 
‘Muslim leaders openly declare their goal of introducing Islamic law  once Denmark’s Muslim population grows large enough – a not-that-remote prospect. If present trends persist, one sociologist 
estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark  in 40 years will be Muslim.’ 
It is easy to understand why a growing number of Danes would feel that   Muslim immigrants show little respect for Danish values and laws.   An example is the phenomenon common to other European countries and    Canada: some Muslims in Denmark  who opted to leave the Muslim faith have been murdered in the name of Islam, while others hide in fear for their  lives. Jews are also threatened and harassed openly by Muslim leaders  in Denmark, a country where once Christian citizens worked to smuggle out nearly all of their 7,000 Jews by night to  Sweden  – before the Nazis could  invade. I think of my Danish friend Elsa – who. as a teenager. had dreaded crossing the street to the bakery every morning under the eyes of occupying  Nazi soldiers – and I wonder what she would say today. 
In 2001,  Denmark  elected the most conservative government in some 70  years- one that had some decidedly non-generous ideas about liberal unfettered immigration. Today  Denmark  has the strictest immigration policies  in  Europe  . ( Its effort to protect itself has been met with accusations of  ‘racism’ by liberal media across Europe – even as other governments struggle to right the social problems wrought by years of too-lax immigration.) 
If you wish to become Danish, you must attend three years of language  classes. You must pass a test on  Denmark’s history, culture, and a Danish language test . 

Then, you must live in Denmark for 7 years before applying for citizenship.  

You must demonstrate an intent to work, and have a job waiting. If you wish  to bring a spouse into Denmark, you must both be over 24 years of age, and  you won’t find it so easy anymore to move your friends and family to    Denmark with you. 
You will not be allowed to build a mosque in  Copenhagen. Although your  children have a choice of some 30 Arabic culture and language schools  in Denmark, they will be strongly encouraged to assimilate to Danish society   in ways that past immigrants weren’t. 
In 2006, the Danish minister for employment, Claus Hjort Frederiksen,  spoke publicly of the burden of Muslim immigrants on the Danish welfare  system, and it was horrifying:

the government’s welfare committee had calculated that if immigration from Third World countries were blocked, 75  percent of the cuts needed to sustain the huge welfare system in coming decades would be unnecessary. In other words, the welfare system, as it  existed, was being exploited by immigrants to the point of eventually  bankrupting the government. ‘We are simply forced to adopt a new policy on immigration’. 

‘The calculations of the welfare committee are terrifying and show how  unsuccessful the integration of immigrants has been up to now,’ he said. 
A large thorn in the side of  Denmark’s imams is the Minister of  Immigration and Integration, Rikke Hvilshoj.. She makes no bones about the  new policy toward immigration,

‘The number of foreigners coming to the  country makes a difference,’ Hvilshoj says, ‘There is an inverse correlation  between how many come here and how well we can receive the foreigners that  come.’

And on Muslim immigrants needing to demonstrate a willingness to blend in,

 ‘In my view,  Denmark  should be a country with  room for different cultures and religions. Some values, however, are  more important than others. We refuse to question democracy, equal rights,  and freedom of speech.’ 
Hvilshoj has paid a price for her show of backbone.. Perhaps to test her resolve, the leading radical imam in Denmark, Ahmed Abdel Rahman Abu  Laban, demanded that the government pay blood money to the family of a  Muslim who was murdered in a suburb of Copenhagen, stating that the family’s  thirst for revenge could be thwarted for money.. When Hvilshoj dismissed his demand, he argued that in Muslim culture the payment of retribution money  was common, to which Hvilshoj replied that what is done in a Muslim country  is not necessarily what is done in Denmark. The Muslim reply came soon after: her house was torched while she, her husband and children slept.All  managed to escape unharmed, but she and her family were moved to a secret location and she and other ministers were assigned bodyguards for the first  time – in a country where such murderous violence was once so scarce.. 
Her government has slid to the right, and her borders have tightened.  Many believe that what happens in the next decade will determine  whether Denmark survives as a bastion of good living, humane thinking and  social responsibility, or whether it becomes a nation at civil war with  supporters of Sharia law. 
And meanwhile, Canadians clamor for stricter immigration policies, and  demand an end to state welfare programs that allow many immigrants to live on the public dole. As we in Canada look at the enclaves of Muslims amongst  us, and see   those who enter our shores too easily, dare live on our taxes, yet refuse to embrace our culture, respect our traditions, participate in  our legal system, obey our laws, speak our language, appreciate our history 
..  we would do well to look to  Denmark  , and say a prayer for her future and  for our own..


  1. Wow. Thanks for this. I am hopeless about our country’s future and safety. I know the only way our people will wake up is to read the Quran (in chronological order, not ‘short verse first order), research Mohammed’s life, and see the European and Middle-Eastern news, from unbiased sources. This takes ingenuity and effort and time. Our people are depressed and apathetic, due in part to our federal/state sponsored mass poisoning by sodium fluoride. (Rat poison, first used by the Nazis to render their prisoners more docile). Our own indoctrination makes us poorly equipped to deal straight-on and use common sense, without which, we are doomed in this insidious problem. We are too good hearted for our own safety. We believe all others are as well-intentioned as we are. I guess this has to happen, but it is tragic. We let it happen to us. We were too busy and trusting watching American Idol and going to football to notice that our enemy was busy implememting the strategies of their war on infidels and infidel nations.
    We are in trouble. I hate to see it. Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln feared this coming upon us, feared our becoming complacent and letting diligence fall by the wayside.
    Our enemy has not lost their prophet’s vision, which we have no idea about. We havent’ been allowed by our ‘free’ press and media to hear the truth. No one knows about Geert Wilders’ trip here to give a speech (inspiring,l great, truth, common-sense decency, defending our slain ones and their infidel loved ones, and all Americans). No one has even heard of him or his short, factual docu-film, Fitna.
    Shame on our leaders, shame on the bought-off press/media, shame on us for letting them do it to us.
    We need to read our enemy’s war manual and then we will wake up, fast. Bush lied to us, Clinton lied to us, (all the time, about this too), Obama lies continually about it). “We are not at war against Islam” (like that is a good thing). “Islam is Peace” (any idiot can see and read that it is violent, brutal tyranny). What we should be told is the truth for once: Islam is at war with us.
    We need to defend. That is our right.
    And it is no ones’ right, no matter how pathetic we see them, to be allowed to threaten us, kill us and scream our complete destruction in our own land. And we should not be so foolish as to invite them in without reservation. Or look the other way as they declare war on us in our streets and in our Mosques.
    What our leaders are up to, I don’t know. Why are they following a policy of lying to their people who they are supposed to be defending against any stated, avowed enemy?

    • Ingrid Thank you for your comments….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


%d bloggers like this: