Posted by: bj | August 30, 2009

What Obama Reads – What He Should Read –

 

          CAPTION: This is another prime example of Palin's parental skills..... her daughter Piper (Piper Palin? OK) is pissed at some little boy and she is giving him the 'finger'.
  Obama’s newest reading material is: “The Post American World” written by Fareed Zakaria, a Muslim, born in India, eduacted at Yale & Harvard; Editor of Newsweek International, and living in New York.  His book, released in May 2008,  was on the NY Times, top 13 list,  for 13 weeks.  Mr. Zakaria is a confused American.  In the 70’s & 80’s he was a devotee of Ronald Reagan.  In 2008, he thought Barak Obama was wonderful.  

If Mr. Obama wanted to  do well he should read:  “Liberty & Tyranny, A Conservative Manifesto”, the hottest non fiction published in 2009, written by Mark Levin;  that was number 1 on the NY Times best seller list for 12 weeks;  # 2 for 6 weeks;  #  3 for one week and still going strong.    

Although a confused journalist, Mr Zakaria is right in some respects because Americas journalists are 90% liberal; and partly because of this and our vote buying politicians, America  is trending to the left, the same direction Europe (which is socialist)  has taken over the last 50 years, while Zakaria’s “up and comming countries”, China, Brazil, and India are all adopting more conservative  free market economic principals.

Moral of the Story = Free Market Principals  =  Countries That will Lead the World in the Future = Not Where  Obama is Headed

Synopsis of “THE POST AMERICAN WORLD”

The content is divided into seven chapters. The first chapter introduces the thesis of the book: that a ‘post-American’ world order is emerging in which the United States of America will continue to be the most powerful nation but its relative power will be diminished. He believes that there have been three power shifts in the last 500 years: a shift of power to the West during the Renaissance, a shift of power to the US making it a superpower, and now a shift to several surging countries, especially China and India, and to non-governmental organisations. Zakaria believes that international organizations are not adapting well to emerging challenges and that there is too much focus on problems arising from potential market failures or general crises (e.g. terrorism) at the expense of focus on problems stemming from success (e.g. development causing environmental degradation, or rising demand creating high commodity prices).

The world is moving from anger to indifference, from anti-Americanism to post-Americanism. The fact that new powers are more strongly asserting their interests is the reality of the post-American world. It also raises the political conundrum of how to achieve international objectives in a world of many actors, state and nonstate.
—Fareed Zakaria, The Post-American World, pages 36–37.

The second and third chapters examine factors that led to the current power balance. Power shifted to the West because it fostered trade with foreign peoples and developed superior labour productivityper capita. Power shifted to the US because of its strong democracy and capitalist market. Zakaria argues that the success of the US in promoting free market capitalism and globalisation has led to power being dispersed to several other countries. Economies have been surging for decades, in part due to large new players entering the global market place. He compares this era’s economic growth to the economic surges of the 1890s and the 1950swhich also saw new players become global powers. At the same time, Zakaria sees attitudes in the US becoming insular and distrustful of foreigners.

The fourth chapter focuses on China. Its strategy of small, gradual reforms have allowed it to quietly modernize. It has become the second most powerful nation, but still unlikely to match the US for decades to come. China’s strengths include a philosophy that reflects Confucian ideals of practicality, ethics and rationalism. Its non-combative foreign policy is more appealing, most notably in Africa, to interventionist Western-style policy that demands reforms in other countries. China’s weakness, though, is a fear of social unrest.

The fifth chapter focuses on India. Contrasted to China, India has a bottom-up democratic political system constantly subject to social unrest but which only results in few politicians losing an election. Its political systemis characterized by strong regionalism — often placing high priority on regional interests rather than national. Zakaria lists India’s advantages: independent courts that enforce contracts, private property rights, rule of law, an established private sector, and many business savvy English-speaking people.

The sixth chapter compares the American rise to superpower status and its use of power. He draws parallels between the British Empire in the 1890s and starting the Boer War with the US in the 2000s and starting the Iraq War. The difference between them is that the British had unsurpassed political power but lost its economic dominance, whereas the US, in the 2000s, had huge economic power but faltering political influence. Zakaria defends the US from indicators that suggest American decline but warns that internal partisan politics, domestic ideological attack groups, special interest power, and a sensationalistic media are weakening the federal government’s ability to adapt to new global realities.

The final chapter outlines how the US has used its power and provides six guidelines for the US to follow in the ‘post-American world’ envisioned by Zakaria.

Posted by: bj | August 27, 2009

Pelosi – Finally put in her Place –

This is a letter dated August 11, 2009 from an Attorney and former member of our  military in the Vietnam war to Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House from San Francisco.    This will help wake up America.

Daniel Hannen is a Member of the European Parliamnet (MEP.  He represents the  South Eastern Portion of England.  Check out his comments on Gordon Brown, the UK Prime Minister.

Daniel Hannan speaks to Gordon Brown, UK Prime Minister about spending  $$                   5 Stars      * * * * *
 Daniel Hannan in the US Part  IV   –  Cap & Trade
Posted by: bj | August 24, 2009

Daniel Hannon # I US versus EU Constitution

 

Daniel Hannan in the US  #  I  –    The US Constitution versus the European Union Constitution   This is   good  facinating good suff  —————-

Daniel Hannan in the US Part  III  –   National Health Care In UK & US  

Fanny Mae eases credit to sub-prime borrowers – September 30, 1999.   Thanks to Bill Clinton, Barney Frank & Chris Dodd this stimulated the economic melt down.

http://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/30/business/fannie-mae-eases-credit-to-aid-mortgage-lending.html

Government spending is a temporary fix and adds nothing to the long term growth of the economy.   It takes resources that already exist and spends $ for inferior purposes & for a  political agenda. 

Public spending creates temporary jobs (unless they are government jobs);  which is not a good thing because it has to be paid for by the  private sectore which is taxed to apy for it.  

  Private Investment creates permanent jobs. 

http://www.fff.org/comment/com0907c.asp

In 2008, when gasoline was between $4.00 and  $4.50 per gallon, Obama thought it was not high enough;  he just  thought it went up too fast. 

On June 11, 2008, Barak Obama made the following remarks: 

“We have been slow to move in a better direction to adopt an energy policy.  The Bush administration has had no energy policy. I would prefer a gradual adjustment.  Such a fast upward movement in price is not a good thing.  The price has risen fast because of the big demand for oil by India & China.  We need to help people make an adjustment by putting money in their pockets.”

These statements are just amazing.  The Bush administration has been pushing congress for more drilling, more nuclear power plants, more refineries, alternative energy of wind & solar for 7 years.  The environmental lobby and liberals fight this on every front.  Obama wants  higher gasoline prices.

 The liberal politicians want higher gas prices.  They want higher gas prices because they want us out of our cars, into mass transit and on our bicycles.  As Jimmie Carter suggested years ago when he forced the “prime rate to 21%”, use less, turn down your thermostats  & wear your sweaters.

Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reed, Barak Obama & most liberals  think that oil and coal are polluting the world and causing green house gasses which is causing “global warming”.  Thus, they say, we must eliminate oil & coal from our lives and move to “renewal sources of energy”. 

We have had a coal & oil based economy for 130 years.  We are not going to go 100% to renewals in 10, 20,  30 or even 40 years.  If we continue down the road of no more off shore drilling, no nuclear power, no new refineries, the price of a gallon of Gasoline will approach $10 to $15 per gallon and bankrupt the country. 

We have 3 to 4  times the supply of oil they have in the Middle East in US coal, oil, oil sands and oil shale, but the liberal politicians will not allow us to access it.  We have to end the $700 billion, annual transfer of wealth to the Middle east and pay ourselves.  As soon as this announcement is made the price of oil will drop dramatically.  The price dropped over $14 per barrel   when The Bush Administration removed the ban on off shore drilling.  Now it is up to the states and the politicians.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4Tmi_fpUHs

Posted by: bj | August 24, 2009

Tiger Woods At the Obama Inaugartion

Tiger Woods Speach at the Obama Presidential Inaugaration.  This is great.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjFIlbF3Nn4

file:///C:/Users/Bob/Desktop/Taxes%20&%20Politics/Tiger%20Woods%20Speech%20at%20Obama%20Inaugaration.html

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories