Dec. 8, 2020; Tucker Carlson: Fox News: Direct from a Chinese professor in Beijing. His video has been taken down by the CCP. See it here.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/eric-swalwell-chinese-spy-influx-of-russians

FBI stepped in after suspected Chinese spy got close to Swalwell, other politicians, report finds

Before fleeing to China the suspected spy targeted a number of up-and-coming local politicians, the report says.

As Beijing is called the greatest threat to the U.S., what the Biden administration should do to confront China. Axios reported that a Chinese national named Fang Fang or Christine Fang targeted up-and-coming local politicians, including those who had the potential to become national figures.

Current and former intelligence officials told the outlet that Fang used campaign fundraising, networking and rallies as well as romantic relationships with at least two Midwestern mayors and possibly Swalwell to gain proximity to political power. She also attended regional mayoral conferences.

While officials do not believe she received or passed on classified information, officials believed the case “was a big deal, because there were some really, really sensitive people that were caught up in the network,” one official told the outlet.

As for Swalwell, Fang reportedly took part in fundraising for the liberal congressman’s 2014 reelection campaign — although she did not make donations nor was there evidence of illegal contributions.

Fang’s earliest known engagement with Swalwell occurred through the Chinese Student Association, Axios reported, and by 2014, she had developed “close ties” to Swalwell’s office.

Fang is also reported to have placed at least one intern in Swalwell’s office and interacted with him at multiple events over several years.According to Axios, investigators became so alarmed by Fang’s behavior and activities that they alerted Swalwell in 2015 to their concerns, and gave him a “defensive briefing.” Swalwell then cut off all ties with Fang and has not been accused of any wrongdoing, according to an official who spoke to the outlet.

Fang went on to leave the country in the midst of an FBI investigation.

In a statement to the outlet, Swalwell’s office said: “Rep. Swalwell, long ago, provided information about this person — whom he met more than eight years ago, and whom he hasn’t seen in nearly six years — to the FBI. To protect information that might be classified, he will not participate in your story.”

His office did not provide any further comment to Fox News.

Fang also volunteered for the 2014 House bid of Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., and a 2013 fundraiser for Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii. Khanna’s office said the congressman saw Fang at several gatherings but had no further contact, while Gabbard’s office told the outlet she “has no recollection of ever meeting or talking with [Fang], nor any recollection of her playing a major role at the fundraiser.”

Posted by: bj | December 7, 2020

Sidney Powell Releases The Smoking Gun In Georgia

Sidney Powell Releases The Smoking Gun In Georgia

CLICK HERE TO READ FULL ARTICLE

December 6, 2020 1:27 PM Ware County, Georgia has broken the Dominion algorithm: Using sequestered Dominion Equipment, Ware County ran a equal number of Trump votes and Biden votes through the Tabulator and the Tabulator reported a 26% lead for Biden.37 Trump votes used in the equal sample run had been “Switched” from Trump to Biden. In actual algorithmic terms this means that a vote for Trump was counted as 87% of a vote and a vote for Biden was counted as 113% of a vote. Those conducting the test were so shocked that they ran the same ballots again. The same results appeared.ONE PIECE OF THE PUZZLE SOLVED. (It is worth noting that this was one County, and on one Tabulator alone.Dominion Tabulators could have been configured with different algorithms in different Counties or States.)  

The point is there is now hard evidence of electronic manipulation of the Election.

The Virginia results in the 2020 Election for President gave Joe Biden a 2.4 million vote lead over President Trump’s 2.0 million votes.  What’s odd and needs investigating is how the election ended up this way.

No one seems to be questioning the votes in Virginia but they should be.  There are multiple reasons why the Virginia results in the 2020 Presidential election should be investigated.

Virginia’s election results started coming in shortly after the polls closed on Election Day.  There were 378 separate entries or feeds in Virginia found in the file obtained and shared around the web from the New York Times since the election.  The NYT data feed shows all the entries from the NYT for the Presidential election at a state by state level. This data does not include county or precinct level data feeds.

One oddity in the file noted immediately is that the results for votes are not in whole integers (e.g. 1, 2, 3…).  All of the entries have fractional amounts.  This makes no sense since ballots do not come in fractions in the US.  Each vote equals one vote. The fractional entries prove the Dominion software was used to manipulate the vote

The first 125 entries reported in the New York Times data feed were basically reasonable.  The results varied in percentage of votes between Presidential candidates and appeared to be random with most votes going to President Trump.  Up through this time (11:03 Eastern), President Trump was leading 52% to Biden’s 46%.  At this time 3.3 million of the eventual 4.4 million votes had already been cast or about 75% of the vote was in.   This is when things went off the rails.

Eight entries totaling nearly (800,000) votes were removed from the database during this time.  This makes no sense. Each vote should be added to the vote totals not taken away.

Overall three entries of over 300,000 votes were posted in the data base to Biden’s vote total.  Two entries of over 300,000 votes were taken away.  The same happened to President Trump’s totals but in much smaller amounts.  Overall 851,000 votes were added to Biden’s totals and only 318,000 were awarded to President Trump between 11:14pm (Eastern) on November 3rd and 5:00am November 4th.  This resulted in over half a million more votes net and 73% of the votes going to Biden during this timeframe.

What’s really odd about these entries are the huge negative entries.  One entry taking away 330,153.54 votes from Biden and 37,510.39 from Trump appears to have reversed an entry a few minutes that at around midnight.  Then at 12:26 and 12:30am an entry in the amount of 308,341.59 from Biden and 80,357.05 from Trump was posted and reversed.  The exact same amounts.  A few hours later another 230,000 votes net were added to Biden’s lead.

These reversing entries look like adjusting entries.  Anyone in the accounting profession is aware of entries posted in error that are reversed and replaced with the proper entries and amounts.  Why the hell would Virginia need to make these types of entries in their voting system?  There really is no logical reason except for fraud.

After these entries noted above were recorded, nearly every entry made into the system for the Presidential election had the same proportion of votes of Biden to Trump.

This too is not reasonable and impossible.  There is nothing random about this.  It is highly, highly unlikely that the results of all these entries would be at the same proportion. This too indicates fraud.

In summary after 11pm on Election Day nearly 70% of the votes recorded in Virginia went to Biden.  This included hundreds of thousands of negative votes and late votes that all had the same proportion of Biden to Trump.  These entries indicate election fraud occurred in Virginia.

To see how this affects the Virginia 2020 vote for President, see the below post on Virginia Voting results

Begin at the 8:00 minute mark

Votes can be manipulated in seconds by: allocating a final outcome percentage to be achieved by each side or many other methods. This is why the Virginia running vote totals received by the New Your Times on the Trump / Biden vote counting were all recorded in votes by 2 decimal places. For example: one vote for any selected party does not equal 1.00; but could be less than 1.00 or .65 of one vote or more than one vote 1.49 for example. Or the Vote rigger wishes Biden to win by 50.50% and Trump to loose by 49.50% would result in each receiving real votes in the 2 or more decimal places, which are then presented to the public in whole numbers.

Posted by: bj | December 4, 2020

Lou Dobbs Interviews Michael Flynn

Posted by: bj | December 3, 2020

Swoop – The Magpie –

Posted by: bj | December 3, 2020

Christmas 3 D Sky show by Drones

Dec. 3, 2020: Recorded On Video

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories